rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2024

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2024

Surgical Rhinoplasty in Mild Forms of Body Dysmorphic Disorder: Safety, Protocols, and Long-Term Outcomes

Shandilya M, Bourke S, Shandilya A.

What this paper says

Fifteen patients with mild body dysmorphic disorder who passed a two specialist screening protocol all reported being happy after rhinoplasty, though 3 of 15 requested revision surgery.

Overview

Surgery in severe body dysmorphic disorder is considered contraindicated because patients are usually dissatisfied and symptoms rarely improve. The authors argue that mild cases may benefit. This second article in their series applies the two specialist protocol described earlier, then reports outcomes with a visual analog scale and a five point Likert scale.

Sections of note

  • Design: outcome report on a selected subgroup from a 13 year practice cohort, 2010 to 2023.
  • 1602 patients sought cosmetic rhinoplasty; 892 were sent for psychiatric evaluation; 22, 2.5 percent, had mild body dysmorphic disorder; 15 were considered suitable and had surgery.
  • Follow up ranged from 6 to 95 months, mean 54.13 months.
  • Outcomes: 5 of 15 scored 10 out of 10, 8 of 15 scored 7 to 9, and 2 of 15 scored 6 but were still described as happy.
  • 3 of 15 requested revision rhinoplasty, which was not offered, as had been agreed before the original surgery. The authors state such requests are common in these cases and patients should be warned.

What it means for a patient

  • With careful screening and support, patients with mild symptoms of the condition were reported to do well over a mean of more than four years.
  • One in five asked for a further operation despite reporting satisfaction, which the authors treat as expected rather than as failure.
  • Refusing revision was agreed in advance, which is itself part of the protocol rather than a response to the request.
  • Limits: 15 patients, one practice, no control group, outcomes rated by scales the authors administered, and no measure of whether the underlying condition improved.

Why this paper matters

Whether any degree of body dysmorphic disorder permits surgery is one of the sharper ethical questions in aesthetic practice, and blanket exclusion is the conventional answer. This report argues for a graded approach with structured safeguards. Fifteen patients cannot settle the question, and symptom change was not measured.

Terms

  • Body dysmorphic disorder: a condition involving preoccupation with a perceived flaw in appearance.
  • Mandatory psychiatric evaluation: a required assessment by a psychiatrist before surgery is offered.
  • Visual analog scale: a line on which severity or satisfaction is marked.
  • Likert scale: a response format where a rater chooses along a graded range.
  • Revision rhinoplasty: a second operation to correct the result of an earlier one.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is an obsessive-compulsive disorder concerning body image which negatively distorts the patient's perception of their appearance. In rhinoplasty, surgery on patients with severe BDD is considered contraindicated as patients are often dissatisfied and their BDD symptoms rarely improve.…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2024
Authors
3
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2024.

  1. ASJ
    2024PMID 38682262Full text
  2. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  3. ASJ
    2024PMID 38452148Summary
  4. APS
    2024PMID 37430011Summary
  5. APS
    2024PMID 38575764Summary
  6. APS
    2024PMID 38519572Summary
  7. APS
    2024PMID 38528125Summary
  8. APS
    2024PMID 38862661Summary