Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2022
Multidimensionality of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rhinoplasty Satisfaction
Verkest V, Pingnet L, Fransen E, Declau F.
What this paper says
Testing four questionnaires in 106 patients, the analysis identified four separate dimensions of rhinoplasty satisfaction: nose appearance, nostril appearance, breathing, and psychosocial wellbeing.
Overview
The FACE-Q rhinoplasty module for nose and nostrils, the Utrecht questionnaire and the NOSE scale are validated Dutch instruments for measuring rhinoplasty satisfaction. The study analysed what these four questionnaires actually measure and how well they detect change. It was a prospective single centre study in a consecutive group of Dutch speaking patients completing all four before surgery and at three months.
Sections of note
- Prospective single centre study; 106 Dutch speaking patients.
- Item quality was confirmed in all four questionnaires.
- Backward binary logistic regression found NOSE and the FACE-Q nose module were the best at distinguishing before from after surgery.
- Combining those two gave a specificity of 97.33 percent and a sensitivity of 94.52 percent for that distinction.
- Exploratory factor analysis identified four dimensions: appearance of the nose, appearance of the nostrils, nasal function, and psychosocial wellbeing.
- A lack of factorial invariance was detected before surgery compared with after, especially in the FACE-Q nose module and to a lesser extent the Utrecht questionnaire.
- The authors conclude the questionnaires measure different dimensions and are complementary.
What it means for a patient
- Satisfaction after rhinoplasty is not one thing; it splits into four measurable components including psychological wellbeing.
- No single questionnaire captures all four, so surgeons using only one see part of the picture.
- The lack of factorial invariance means the questionnaires may not measure quite the same thing before and after surgery, which complicates comparing the two.
- The study covers 106 patients at one centre with three month follow up.
Why this paper matters
Rhinoplasty outcome research relies on these questionnaires, and their pooled use assumes they measure comparable things. This study shows they measure different dimensions and behave differently before and after surgery. That instability before surgery is a caution for how such scores are interpreted.
Terms
- Patient reported outcome measure: a questionnaire completed by the patient rather than the clinician.
- FACE-Q: a validated set of questionnaires on satisfaction with facial appearance.
- NOSE scale: the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation questionnaire.
- Factor analysis: a statistical method identifying the underlying dimensions a set of questions measures.
- Factorial invariance: whether a questionnaire measures the same construct across different conditions.
- Sensitivity and specificity: how well a measure identifies true cases and true non cases.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The FACE-Q rhinoplasty module (nose and nostrils), Utrecht questionnaire, and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale are validated Dutch patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate rhinoplasty satisfaction. The objective of this study was to analyze the dimensionality of the measured variables in…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2022.
- ASJ Spreader Graft vs Spreader Flap in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aesthetic and Functional OutcomesKeyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Cheshmi B et al.2022PMID 34864854Summary
- APS Body Dysmorphic and Narcissistic Personality Disorder in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty CandidatesSahraian A, Janipour M, Tarjan A et al.2022PMID 34820690Summary
- APS Correction to: Body Dysmorphic and Narcissistic Personality Disorder in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty CandidatesSahraian A, Janipour M, Tarjan A et al.2022PMID 34928400
- APS Invited Discussion on: Quality of Life And Outcome After Preservation Rhinoplasty Using The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation QuestionnaireGruber RP, Deptula P, Conkling N2022PMID 35320375
- APS Quality of Life (QoL) and Outcome After Preservation Rhinoplasty (PR) Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire-A Prospective Observational Single-Centre StudyStergiou G, Schweigler A, Finocchi V et al.2022PMID 35169915Summary
- APS Reply to: Invited Discussion on: Quality of Life and Outcome After Preservation Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation QuestionnaireBarone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P2022PMID 35737021Summary
- APS Surgical Removal of Foreign Material by Suction Curettage After Injection Rhinoplasty: Patient-Reported OutcomesHe J, Bian W, Yang J et al.2022PMID 36175688Summary
- FPS Assessment of Different Middle Vault Reconstruction Techniques in Rhinoplasty from Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome MeasuresŞahin FF, Apaydın F, Göde S2022PMID 35158388Summary