Journal archive · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2022
Assessment of Different Middle Vault Reconstruction Techniques in Rhinoplasty from Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Şahin FF, Apaydın F, Göde S.
What this paper says
Across 129 patients treated with four different middle vault techniques, all produced significant improvement on the questionnaires, except that dorsal preservation with a high strip did not improve breathing scores.
Overview
The study compared four ways of handling the middle third of the nose using multiple patient reported questionnaires, covering both structural and dorsal preservation approaches. Outcomes were assessed before surgery and at 2 and 12 months afterward using the NOSE scale, the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation and the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey.
Sections of note
- Comparative study of 129 patients across four techniques.
- The techniques were spreader graft, L-strut graft, dorsal preservation with a high strip, and dorsal preservation with a low strip.
- Assessments were at baseline, 2 months and 12 months.
- All techniques produced significant improvement on all questionnaires, P less than 0.001.
- The exception was dorsal preservation with a high strip, which did not improve NOSE scores.
- Between the short term and longer term assessments, no significant differences were seen in the dorsal preservation groups.
- The structural technique groups did show differences between those time points.
- The authors state they detected no difference in the improvement of patient reported outcomes for preservation techniques from 2 months to 1 year.
What it means for a patient
- Three of the four techniques improved both breathing and appearance scores; the high strip preservation technique did not improve breathing.
- Results after preservation techniques were stable from 2 months onward, while structural techniques continued to change.
- Group sizes for each technique are not stated, so the comparisons rest on unknown numbers.
- This is a comparative study without randomization, so technique choice reflected the individual nose.
Why this paper matters
The middle third is where hump removal risks narrowing the airway, and the choice of reconstruction method is claimed to matter for breathing. This study compares four options with three validated questionnaires out to a year. The one technique that failed to improve breathing scores is the finding needing further examination.
Terms
- Middle vault: the middle third of the nose between the bony bridge and the tip.
- Spreader graft: a cartilage strip beside the septum that widens the internal breathing valve.
- L-strut graft: an L-shaped cartilage support for the bridge and base of the nose.
- Dorsal preservation: lowering the natural bridge instead of cutting the hump off.
- High and low strip: where the strip of septum is removed to allow the bridge to settle.
- NOSE: the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation questionnaire.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“It is important to assess the patient satisfaction with shape and function by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following structural or dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) techniques on the middle nasal vault. To analyze the results of different middle vault rhinoplasty techniques with multiple PROMs and…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Cleft, trauma and reconstruction
171 papers on this topic.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2022.
- ASJ Spreader Graft vs Spreader Flap in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aesthetic and Functional OutcomesKeyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Cheshmi B et al.2022PMID 34864854Summary
- APS Body Dysmorphic and Narcissistic Personality Disorder in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty CandidatesSahraian A, Janipour M, Tarjan A et al.2022PMID 34820690Summary
- APS Correction to: Body Dysmorphic and Narcissistic Personality Disorder in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty CandidatesSahraian A, Janipour M, Tarjan A et al.2022PMID 34928400
- APS Invited Discussion on: Quality of Life And Outcome After Preservation Rhinoplasty Using The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation QuestionnaireGruber RP, Deptula P, Conkling N2022PMID 35320375
- APS Quality of Life (QoL) and Outcome After Preservation Rhinoplasty (PR) Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire-A Prospective Observational Single-Centre StudyStergiou G, Schweigler A, Finocchi V et al.2022PMID 35169915Summary
- APS Reply to: Invited Discussion on: Quality of Life and Outcome After Preservation Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation QuestionnaireBarone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P2022PMID 35737021Summary
- APS Surgical Removal of Foreign Material by Suction Curettage After Injection Rhinoplasty: Patient-Reported OutcomesHe J, Bian W, Yang J et al.2022PMID 36175688Summary
- CPS Cleft RhinoplastyOlds CE, Sykes JM2022PMID 34782130Summary