rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Non-surgical and filler rhinoplasty · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Complications and management · 2020

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2020

Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Technique, Outcomes, and Complications

Williams LC, Kidwai SM, Mehta K, Kamel G, Tepper OM, Rosenberg JD.

What this paper says

Pooling 23 studies covering 1,600 patients treated with nasal filler, nearly 95 percent were satisfied and only 26 relatively minor complications were reported, with no cases of skin death or visual loss.

Overview

Filler injection into the nose is offered to patients who want a temporary result or wish to avoid surgery, and to correct irregularities after rhinoplasty. This systematic review assembled what has been published on filler types, injection technique, satisfaction and complications.

Sections of note

  • Systematic review searching PubMed, EmBase, the Cochrane Library and Scopus using keyword and Medical Subject Headings terms.
  • Data collected from each study covered satisfaction, complications, injection material, location and technique.
  • 4,632 studies were found; after full-text screening, 23 were included.
  • 1,600 patients underwent nonsurgical rhinoplasty across those studies.
  • Materials used: hyaluronic acid in 73.38 percent, calcium hydroxyapatite in 12.44 percent.
  • Nearly 95 percent of patients were satisfied with results.
  • Only 26 relatively minor complications were reported, with no vascular complications such as skin necrosis or visual compromise; the authors state complications may be underreported.

What it means for a patient

  • Across the published literature, satisfaction is high and reported complications are minor.
  • No cases of skin death or blindness appeared in these 1,600 patients, but the authors explicitly warn that such events are likely underreported.
  • Hyaluronic acid is the dominant material, which matters because it can be dissolved if a problem occurs.
  • Limits: 23 studies of varying design, and published series are unlikely to capture rare catastrophic events.

Why this paper matters

Nasal filler's safety profile is contested because severe vascular complications are rare but devastating and case reports exist. This shows the published series do not capture them. The gap between case reports and series is itself the finding.

Terms

  • Nonsurgical rhinoplasty: Reshaping the nose with injectable filler instead of surgery.
  • Hyaluronic acid: A filler material that can be dissolved with an enzyme if needed.
  • Calcium hydroxyapatite: A longer-lasting filler material that cannot be dissolved.
  • Vascular compromise: Blood flow blocked or reduced in an area.
  • Skin necrosis: Death of skin tissue from loss of blood supply.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Nonsurgical rhinoplasty using filler injections has become a common procedure in cosmetic practices. This is offered to patients that prefer a temporary outcome or would like to avoid general anesthesia. In addition, it can be used in postrhinoplasty patients to correct nasal deformities or irregularities. This…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2020
Authors
6
Type
Journal Article, Systematic Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2020.

  1. ASJ
    2020PMID 31181135
  2. ASJ
    2020PMID 31886850
  3. ASJ
    2020PMID 31051500Summary
  4. ASJ
    2020PMID 30868159Summary
  5. APS
    2020PMID 31832733Summary
  6. APS
    2020PMID 31797043Summary
  7. APS
    2020PMID 32514639Summary
  8. APS
    2020PMID 32410200Summary