rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2024

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2024

Patient Selection, Outcome, and Unhappy Patients in Rhinoplasty

Parmar P, Mills H, Saleh H.

What this paper says

A review of how patients are selected for rhinoplasty and why some end up unhappy, recommending collaboration with specialist psychologists and describing warning signs to look for.

Overview

The article covers the psychological aspects of choosing who should have rhinoplasty. It argues for identifying warning signs and applying a multidisciplinary approach in collaboration with psychologists specializing in rhinoplasty patients. It also discusses patient motivations and surgeon factors as contributors to unhappy outcomes, and describes reasons adverse outcomes arise before and after surgery.

Sections of note

  • Article type: narrative review. No patient numbers, rates or outcome data are reported.
  • Topic one: the process of patient selection and the psychological factors bearing on it.
  • Topic two: identifying warning signs and working with specialist rhinoplasty psychologists.
  • Topic three: patient motivations as a driver of unsatisfactory outcomes.
  • Topic four: surgeon factors as a separate driver of unsatisfactory outcomes.
  • Topic five: reasons adverse outcomes occur across both the preoperative and postoperative periods.
  • The article closes with a brief guide to reducing the risk of an unhappy patient.
  • Neither the warning signs nor the surgeon factors are named in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • Whether a patient is satisfied depends partly on why they wanted surgery, which is why motivation is assessed at consultation.
  • The article names surgeon factors alongside patient factors, so responsibility for a poor outcome is not placed on the patient alone.
  • Working with a psychologist is framed as routine collaboration rather than as something reserved for suspected disorder.
  • The abstract carries no findings. It names no specific warning signs and reports no rates of dissatisfaction.

Why this paper matters

Dissatisfaction after a technically successful rhinoplasty is a persistent problem, and selection is the main lever surgeons have before the operation. Reviews that formalize selection and involve psychologists move it from intuition toward process. Whether structured selection actually reduces unhappy outcomes has not been demonstrated.

Terms

  • Patient selection: deciding which patients are suitable candidates for an operation.
  • Multidisciplinary approach: care involving several professions working together.
  • Patient motivation: the underlying reason a person seeks surgery.
  • Adverse outcome: a result that falls short of what was intended.
  • Narrative review: a summary of a topic written from expertise rather than a systematic search.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“This article discusses the process of patient selection for rhinoplasties and the many different psychological aspects that come into play. It is important to identify the warning signs and apply a multidisciplinary approach to the surgeons practice, in collaboration with specialist rhinoplasty psychologists.…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2024
Authors
3
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2024.

  1. ASJ
    2024PMID 38682262Full text
  2. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  3. ASJ
    2024PMID 38452148Summary
  4. APS
    2024PMID 37430011Summary
  5. APS
    2024PMID 38575764Summary
  6. APS
    2024PMID 38519572Summary
  7. APS
    2024PMID 38528125Summary
  8. APS
    2024PMID 38862661Summary