rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2022

FPSAM Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine · 2022

The Rhinoplasty Health Care Monitor: Using Validated Questionnaires and a Web-Based Outcome Dashboard to Evaluate Personal Surgical Performance

van Zijl FVWJ, Lohuis PJFM, Datema FR.

What this paper says

Tracking 363 rhinoplasty patients through an automated outcome dashboard, mean nasal obstruction scores fell from 66.6 to 23.2 and appearance related scores from 12.2 to 7.1 one year after surgery.

Overview

The authors present a method for a single surgeon to measure and evaluate their own performance using a web based dashboard. All patients referred to the senior author for functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty, including revisions, between April 2014 and September 2020 were included prospectively. Patients completed validated questionnaires before and after surgery and the scores fed automatically into the dashboard.

Sections of note

  • Prospective analytic cohort study; 603 patients referred, of whom 363 were eligible for rhinoplasty.
  • Instruments were the NOSE scale, the Utrecht Questionnaire and visual analog scales.
  • Scores were exported to a customized web based dashboard called the rhinoplasty health care monitor.
  • The monitor analyses functional and aesthetic outcomes automatically with real time graphic output.
  • Mean NOSE score fell from 66.6 plus or minus 23.5 to 23.2 plus or minus 24.0 at one year, P less than 0.001.
  • Mean Utrecht Questionnaire score fell from 12.2 plus or minus 6.3 to 7.1 plus or minus 3.9, P less than 0.001.
  • The authors state the dashboard helps the surgeon analyse results, identify learning needs and detect trends in performance.

What it means for a patient

  • Both breathing and appearance scores improved substantially at one year.
  • Only 363 of 603 referred patients were considered eligible for surgery, so selection was a substantial part of the process.
  • This is one surgeon's practice with no comparison group, so the scores reflect that surgeon rather than rhinoplasty generally.
  • The wide standard deviation on the postoperative NOSE score indicates results varied considerably between patients.

Why this paper matters

Individual surgeon performance in rhinoplasty is rarely measured systematically, and outcome data usually appears only in retrospective publications. This describes a continuous, automated method for tracking it. Whether monitoring changes a surgeon's results has not been demonstrated.

Terms

  • NOSE scale: the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, where higher scores mean worse breathing.
  • Utrecht Questionnaire: a validated questionnaire on satisfaction with nasal appearance.
  • Visual analog scale: a rating along a line, used here for self assessment.
  • Prospective cohort: a group followed forward in time from enrollment.
  • Dashboard: a screen displaying tracked data updated automatically.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Self-assessment provides valuable feedback in the life-long process of mastering rhinoplasty. This study presents a method to measure and evaluate data-based performance of a single surgeon using a web-based dashboard. Methods: In this prospective analytic cohort study, all patients referred to the senior author for…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
Year
2022
Authors
3
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2022.

  1. ASJ
    2022PMID 34864854Summary
  2. APS
    2022PMID 34820690Summary
  3. APS
    2022PMID 34928400
  4. APS
    2022PMID 35320375
  5. APS
    2022PMID 35169915Summary
  6. APS
    2022PMID 35737021Summary
  7. APS
    2022PMID 36175688Summary
  8. FPS
    2022PMID 35158388Summary