rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2023

PRS-GO Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2023

Prospective Clinical Trial Evaluating the Outcomes Associated with the Use of Fresh Frozen Allograft Cartilage in Rhinoplasty

Wan R, Weissman JP, Williams T, Ullrich PJ, Joshi C, Huffman K, Galiano RD.

What this paper says

In 50 patients, frozen donor rib cartilage held its shape better between 6 and 12 months than the patient's own rib cartilage on two photographic measures, with fewer complications.

Overview

Every graft option in rhinoplasty trades off differently between shape, donor site pain and durability. The authors compared fresh frozen cadaveric costal allograft against traditional autologous rib cartilage in cosmetic and reconstructive rhinoplasty. Shape stability was measured by how much standardized photographic angles drifted between the 6 month and 12 month visits, since warping, shrinkage or displacement would show as change.

Sections of note

  • Design: prospective, single center, nonrandomized, open label clinical trial.
  • 50 eligible patients enrolled between March 2017 and October 2020. Average age 43.9 years, mean follow up 14.8 months.
  • Photographic measures: deviation angle, nasofrontal angle, total facial convexity, nasofacial angle and nasolabial angle, with change taken as the absolute difference between the 6 and 12 month values.
  • In the control group using the patient's own cartilage, drift in deviation angle and nasolabial angle was greater than in the donor cartilage group, p less than 0.05.
  • FACE-Q satisfaction with nose improved in the donor cartilage group at 6 months and 1 year, p less than 0.05, with nostrils and overall facial appearance also improved at 6 months.
  • Complications occurred in 6 donor cartilage patients and 10 control patients.

What it means for a patient

  • Donor rib cartilage avoids a chest incision, which removes the pain and scarring of harvesting your own rib.
  • The donor grafts drifted less in shape over the second half of the first year on two of five measures.
  • Limits: not randomized and open label, so patients and surgeons knew which graft was used, and the abstract does not state the size of each group.
  • Follow up averaged under 15 months. Resorption of donor cartilage typically shows over years.

Why this paper matters

Whether banked donor cartilage matches the patient's own has been argued for decades, mostly on case series. A prospective comparative trial with photographic measurement is a step up in evidence quality. Whether the difference persists past a year, and how it affects revision rates, is unanswered.

Terms

  • Allograft: tissue from a human donor, here processed cadaveric rib cartilage.
  • Autologous: taken from the patient's own body.
  • Costal cartilage: cartilage from the ribs, harvested for use as a graft.
  • Warping: bending or curling of a cartilage graft after placement.
  • Open-label: a study in which everyone knows which treatment was given.
  • FACE-Q: a validated questionnaire measuring satisfaction with facial appearance.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background: There are different types of grafts for rhinoplasty, each with certain advantages and disadvantages. Fresh frozen cadaveric costal allograft (CCA) provides an alternative to rhinoplasties. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of fresh frozen CCA and traditional autologous costal cartilage in cosmetic and reconstructive rhinoplasty procedures.

Methods: This is a prospective, single-center, nonrandomized, open-label clinical trial. Objective assessment to evaluate warping, resorption, and displacement of the cartilage was achieved by measuring the differences of standardized values (deviation angle, nasofrontal angle, total facial convexity, nasofacial angle, and nasolabial angle) obtained at 6-months and 12-months postoperative follow-up on standard two-dimensional photographs (Δ = ∣measurement6 - measurement12∣). Subjective assessment was measured by the FACE-Q assessment.

Results: Fifty eligible patients between March 2017 and October 2020 were included. The average age was 43.9 ± 16.6 years and the mean follow-up period was 14.8 months. In the control group, the changes (Δ) in the deviation angle and nasolabial angle were greater than in the CCA group (P < 0.05). In the CCA group, the mean score of satisfaction with nose improved at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively (P < 0.05). The mean score of satisfaction with nostrils and overall facial appearance also increased in the CCA group at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Six patients from the CCA group and 10 patients from the control group experienced postoperative complications.

Conclusions: Fresh frozen CCA is a safe and reliable source of rhinoplasty grafts. It is aseptic, readily available, and free of donor site complications.

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Year
2023
Authors
7
Type
Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2023.

  1. ASJ
    2023PMID 35786707Summary
  2. ASJ
    2023PMID 36656674Summary
  3. ASJ
    2023PMID 36793242
  4. ASJ
    2023PMID 36004498
  5. ASJ
    2023PMID 37289986Summary
  6. ASJ
    2023PMID 37200406Summary
  7. ASJ
    2023PMID 35748855Summary
  8. APS
    2023PMID 35606536Summary