Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2026
Psychological Red Flags in Rhinoplasty: Predictors of Malpractice Claims
Oduncu M, Çelik M, Boylu ME, Turan Ş, Atan Y.
What this paper says
Comparing 55 rhinoplasty patients who filed malpractice claims with 85 who did not, litigants were older, less educated, more often treated by non-professor specialists in private hospitals, and scored worse on body-image quality of life, self-esteem and somatisation.
Overview
Rhinoplasty has the highest litigation risk among aesthetic procedures, and claims often stem from selection rather than technical error. The Turkish authors used a case-control design: 55 patients referred for forensic evaluation after malpractice claims versus 85 non-litigating rhinoplasty patients, with endoscopy, standardised photographs and psychometric testing (SCL-90-R, BIQLI, Rosenberg Self-Esteem, SWAS).
Sections of note
- Litigants were older (P = .002), less educated (P < .05), more often operated by specialists than professors (P < .001) and in private hospitals (P = .010).
- Higher somatisation prevalence in litigants (P = .019).
- Lower BIQLI, SWAS and RSES scores in litigants (all P < .05).
- Logistic regression: low BIQLI and specialist-level surgery were independent predictors.
- Level of Evidence 3.
What it means for a patient
- Dissatisfaction leading to legal action was linked more to psychological profile than to the technical result in this study.
- Low body-image quality of life before surgery is a warning sign that surgery may not deliver the hoped-for relief.
- Screening questionnaires before surgery protect patients as well as surgeons.
Why this paper matters
It is a rare direct study of litigants with objective examination and psychometrics. Limits: Turkish medico-legal context, case-control design, and litigation as an outcome reflects the legal system as well as the patient.
Terms
- Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD): preoccupation with a perceived minor or absent flaw.
- Somatisation: experiencing psychological distress as physical symptoms.
- BIQLI: Body Image Quality of Life Inventory.
- SCL-90-R: a 90-item symptom checklist for psychological distress.
- Case-control study: comparing people with an outcome against similar people without it.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Rhinoplasty is among the most frequently performed aesthetic procedures worldwide and also carries the highest litigation risk. Malpractice claims often arise less from surgical error than from poor patient selection and overlooked psychological comorbidities. Objectives: This study aimed to identify clinical and…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2026.
- ASJ Dorsal Width and Functional Outcomes with use of Autospreader Flaps in Cosmetic RhinoplastyJabbour N, Pelligrini W, Shehan J et al.2026PMID 42415377Summary
- ASJ Establishing Normative Data on Satisfaction with Nasal Appearance: a Dutch Population-Based Study Using Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Outcome InstrumentsKasapov M, Afonso PM, Datema FR et al.2026PMID 42670247Summary
- ASJ 2026PMID 42424527Summary
- ASJ Secondary Liquid Rhinoplasty: Challenges, Techniques, and Long-term OutcomesValente DS, Zanella RK2026PMID 41124352Summary
- APS Azabache Protocol®: An Integrated Psychological and Ethical Evaluation Framework for Rhinoplasty CandidatesDíaz RA, Robles J2026PMID 41361150Summary
- APS Combination of Autologous Costal Cartilage Harvest for Rhinoplasty and Breast Augmentation Through the Same Incision: Experience in a Vietnam Population and OutcomesNguyen Van P, Nguyen Hoang N2026PMID 42329439Summary
- APS 2026PMID 41461968
- APS Comments on "Autologous Fat Injection for Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Satisfaction, Reinjection, and Fat Retention"Gharibi R, Dashti G, Behnampour M2026PMID 41225218