Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2017
Assessment of Aesthetic Results of 100 Patients Who Underwent Rhinoplasty-Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation
Kotzampasakis D, Mantalos P, Kotzampasakis S, Danias N, Nikolopoulos T.
What this paper says
Among 100 patients surveyed a mean of 6.8 years after cosmetic rhinoplasty, 93 percent scored above 50 percent on a validated satisfaction questionnaire, with a mean score of 82.4 percent.
Overview
Most rhinoplasty satisfaction data comes from the first year or two after surgery. This study asked how results hold up over a much longer span, surveying patients between 3 and 13 years after their operation using a standard questionnaire.
Sections of note
- 100 patients: 34 men and 66 women, aged 23 to 57 years, mean 34.8.
- All were operated on exclusively for aesthetic reasons.
- Time since operation ranged from 3 to 13 years, mean 6.8 years.
- The instrument was the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire, described as simple, reliable, validated, and widely used.
- 93 patients scored above 50 percent; 67 scored above 80 percent; 7 scored below 50 percent.
- Mean score 82.4 plus or minus 1.7 percent, median 87 percent.
- Scores declined slightly across age groups and with years elapsed.
- Women were significantly more satisfied than men, P 0.03.
What it means for a patient
- Satisfaction was high and largely stable across a span of 3 to 13 years in this group.
- About 1 in 14 patients scored below the halfway mark.
- Men reported lower satisfaction than women here.
- Limits: 100 patients from one setting, no comparison group, no preoperative scores, self-reported outcome only, and patients who were unhappy enough to go elsewhere may be underrepresented.
Why this paper matters
Long-term satisfaction data in rhinoplasty is scarce, and this covers a mean of nearly 7 years with a validated instrument. The slight decline over time is worth noting against claims of permanence. Without preoperative scores or a comparison group, the size of the improvement attributable to surgery cannot be read from these numbers.
Terms
- Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation: A validated six-question survey scoring satisfaction with nose appearance and function.
- Validated instrument: A questionnaire tested to show it measures what it claims consistently.
- Median: The middle value, less affected by extremes than the mean.
- Aesthetic rhinoplasty: Surgery done for appearance rather than breathing.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
Abstract
Background: To assess the long-term aesthetic results of rhinoplasty and predict the final outcome.
Methods: The sample was composed of 100 patients (34 men and 66 women) between 23 and 57 years old (mean, 34.8) operated on exclusively for aesthetic reasons. The time elapsed from the operation ranged from 3 to 13 years with a mean of 6.8 years. The study used Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire, a simple, reliable, validated, and widely used inventory.
Results: The vast majority of patients (93%) were satisfied postoperatively with scores > 50% (67 patients had scores > 80%). Only 7 patients had scores less than 50%. The mean score was 82.4 ± 1.7% with a median of 87%. In addition, it seems that the results of the operation remain high through time with a small decline along age groups and years elapsed. Women were found more satisfied than men (P = 0.03).
Conclusions: The study concludes that the results of aesthetic rhinoplasty, if performed by skilled and experienced surgeons, are very satisfying and stable throughout time.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2017.
- ASJ 2017PMID 29025221
- ASJ 2017PMID 28364535
- ASJ Incidence and Preoperative Risk Factors for Major Complications in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Analysis of 4978 PatientsLayliev J, Gupta V, Kaoutzanis C et al.2017PMID 28472446Summary
- ASJ Patient-Specific Augmentation Rhinoplasty Using a Three-Dimensional Simulation Program and Three-Dimensional PrintingChoi YD, Kim Y, Park E2017PMID 28520846Summary
- ASJ 2017PMID 28364534Summary
- APS Columellar Scar Perception in Open Rhinoplasty. Interplay of Scar Awareness, Body Cathexis and Patient SatisfactionYağmur Ç, Ak S, Engin MS et al.2017PMID 28008458Summary
- APS Use of Computer Imaging in Rhinoplasty: A Survey of the Practices of Facial Plastic SurgeonsSingh P, Pearlman S2017PMID 28432415Summary
- FPS Interest in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty ScaleNaraghi M, Atari M2017PMID 28388802Summary