Journal archive · Non-surgical and filler rhinoplasty · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Complications and management · 2015
Injection Rhinoplasty with Hyaluronic Acid and Calcium Hydroxyapatite: A Retrospective Survey Investigating Outcome and Complication Rates
Schuster B.
What this paper says
Among 46 patients treated with injectable filler instead of surgery, 87 percent were very or completely satisfied at nine months, the effect lasted a mean 13.5 months, and all three complications followed calcium hydroxyapatite.
Overview
Injecting filler into the nose can smooth small irregularities without an operation, and the effect wears off rather than being permanent. The author reviewed three years of such treatments using two degradable fillers, comparing before and after images and surveying patients at two time points.
Sections of note
- 46 patients treated across 88 areas over three years. Calcium hydroxyapatite in 26 patients, hyaluronic acid in 20.
- Satisfaction was measured with a 5-point questionnaire at 3 weeks and at 9 months or later.
- 85 percent were satisfied at 3 weeks. 87 percent were very or completely satisfied at 9 months or later, regardless of which filler was used.
- Effect lasted between 6 and 30 months, mean 13.5 months.
- The author attributes positive ratings mainly to accurate prediction beforehand of what the treatment could achieve.
- One moderate and two severe complications occurred, all after calcium hydroxyapatite. Two resolved fully and one patient was lost to follow-up. The practice then switched to hyaluronic acid only.
What it means for a patient
- Filler can correct minor bumps and dips in the nose without surgery, but the correction fades and needs repeating, on average after just over a year.
- Satisfaction was high and did not depend on which filler was used, so the safer material is the reasonable default.
- Three of 46 patients had complications, all with calcium hydroxyapatite, and the practice stopped using it as a result. Hyaluronic acid can also be dissolved if there is a problem.
- Retrospective review from one practice, small numbers, no comparison with surgery, and the severity scale used is not defined in the abstract.
Why this paper matters
Non-surgical rhinoplasty grew rapidly in this period with limited published safety data, and filler complications in the nose can be serious because of its blood supply. Reporting that all complications came from one material, and changing practice accordingly, is directly useful. Numbers remain too small to establish a complication rate.
Terms
- Injection rhinoplasty: reshaping the nose with injectable filler rather than surgery.
- Hyaluronic acid filler: a gel filler that the body breaks down and that can be dissolved with an enzyme.
- Calcium hydroxyapatite: a thicker, longer-lasting filler made of mineral particles in gel, not reversible.
- Biodegradable: broken down and absorbed by the body over time.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Injection rhinoplasty offers an attractive, reversible alternative to surgery. Here we assessed outcome, longevity of benefits, adverse effects, and patient assessment of injection rhinoplasty, using degradable synthetic fillers. Forty-six patients who underwent injection rhinoplasty using degradable fillers over the…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Non-surgical and filler rhinoplasty
88 papers on this topic.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Complications and management
129 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2015.
- ASJ Assessing Demographic Differences in Patient-Perceived Improvement in Facial Appearance and Quality of Life Following RhinoplastySchwitzer JA, Albino FP, Mathis RK et al.2015PMID 26063837Summary
- ASJ 2015PMID 26063832
- ASJ Complications Associated With the Use of Autologous Costal Cartilage in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic ReviewVaradharajan K, Sethukumar P, Anwar M et al.2015PMID 26229125Summary
- ASJ Superior rhinoplasty outcomes with precise nasal osteotomy: an individualized approach for maintaining function and achieving aesthetic goalsGhanaatpisheh M, Sajjadian A, Daniel RK2015PMID 25568232Summary
- APS An Unexpected Rhinoplasty Complication: Bilateral Nasolabial CystOzdogan F, Ozel HE, Esen E et al.2015PMID 26392372Summary
- APS Erratum to: Rhinoplasty as a Medicalized Phenomenon: A 25-Center Survey on Quality of Life Before and After Cosmetic RhinoplastyMohammadshahi M, Pourreza A, Orojlo PH et al.2015PMID 25491014Summary
- FPS A Rare Late Complication of Rhinoplasty: Dorsal Nasal CystAydoğdu İO, Öztürk N, Aksakal İA et al.2015PMID 26579868
- JAMA FPS Complications associated with autologous rib cartilage use in rhinoplasty: a meta-analysisWee JH, Park MH, Oh S et al.2015PMID 25429595Summary