rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Septum, valve and airway · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2019

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2019

Role of Spreader Flaps in Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Patients Undergoing Correction for Severe Septal Deviation with Long-Term Follow-Up

Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R, Colapietra A, Alessandri Bonetti M, Morelli Coppola M, List E, Ciarrocchi S, Tenna S, Persichetti P.

What this paper says

In 264 patients randomized to four techniques for severe septal deviation, combining spreader flaps with spreader grafts gave the best correction of the deviation angle and held it close to straight over long-term follow-up.

Overview

Severe septal deviation is difficult to correct durably, and surgeons disagree about whether flaps, grafts, both or neither should be used. This randomized study compared all four options, measuring the deviation angle on images and collecting satisfaction on a validated questionnaire.

Sections of note

  • 264 patients who had primary rhinoplasty between January 2010 and September 2016 met inclusion criteria.
  • Randomized into four groups: group 1 spreader flaps plus spreader grafts; group 2 flaps alone; group 3 grafts alone; group 4 neither.
  • Patients answered the Italian version of the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module.
  • Anthropometric measurements were made with AutoCAD, determining the angle of deviation before and after surgery, compared with the chi-squared test.
  • Two plastic surgeons reviewed all postoperative photographs and rated them on a scale of 1 to 5.
  • Group 1 showed statistically significant differences from the other groups in deviation angle change, P below 0.01, and maintained an angle close to 180 degrees over long-term follow-up.
  • Groups 1 and 3 were more satisfied than groups 2 and 4, P below 0.01, and were also rated most satisfactory by the two reviewers. Level of evidence IV.

What it means for a patient

  • Using both a flap and a graft together gave the straightest and most durable result for a severely deviated septum.
  • Flaps alone performed no better than doing neither on satisfaction.
  • Grafts alone gave satisfaction comparable to the combination, but not the same durability of correction.
  • Limits: single center, the abstract gives no follow-up duration despite the long-term claim, and the level of evidence is stated as IV despite the randomized design.

Why this paper matters

Middle vault reconstruction after correcting a deviated septum is done differently by different surgeons with little comparative evidence. A four-arm randomized comparison in 264 patients is unusually strong for this field. The unstated follow-up length limits how the durability claim can be read.

Terms

  • Septal deviation: A crooked central wall inside the nose.
  • Spreader graft: A separate cartilage strip placed alongside the septum for support.
  • Spreader flap: The upper lateral cartilage folded inward and used instead of a graft.
  • Angle of deviation: The measured departure of the nose from straight; 180 degrees is straight.
  • FACE-Q: A modular validated questionnaire covering facial appearance outcomes.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“The aim of this randomized controlled study was to analyze the long-term results of patients undergoing rhinoplasty because of severe septal deviation and to evaluate the stability of results. Materials And Methods: The study was performed with a randomized design. Patients were randomly divided into four groups:…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2019
Authors
10
Type
Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2019.

  1. ASJ
    2019PMID 30380010Summary
  2. ASJ
    2019PMID 31145779
  3. ASJ
    2019PMID 30722008Summary
  4. ASJ
    2019PMID 29982464Summary
  5. ASJ
    2019PMID 31329818Summary
  6. ASJ
    2019PMID 29394311Summary
  7. ASJ
    2019PMID 30107387Summary
  8. APS
    2019PMID 30560283Summary