Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · Septum, valve and airway · 2025
Modification of Low-Septal-Strip Septoplasty to Reduce Hump Recurrence in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty
Çelik V, Tuluy Y.
What this paper says
Among 231 dorsal preservation patients, those treated with a modified low septal strip technique had significantly fewer complications and fewer recurrent humps than those treated with the standard version.
Overview
Residual hump and hump recurrence are the recognized problems of dorsal preservation. The authors modified how the lower septal strip is removed and how the septum is then fixed in place, and compared results against the standard technique. All patients had closed dorsal preservation rhinoplasty as a first operation, performed between November 2021 and February 2023.
Sections of note
- Design: retrospective comparison of two techniques, 231 patients. Level of evidence therapeutic III.
- 72 patients, 31.2 percent, had standard low septal strip septoplasty; 159 patients, 68.8 percent, had the modified version.
- All cases were primary rhinoplasty performed by a closed approach.
- Mean follow up: 9.68 months, range 3 to 16.
- Sex and age did not differ significantly between the groups.
- Complications occurred in 8 of 231 patients, 3.5 percent overall.
- Complications were significantly more frequent in the standard group, p equal to 0.012.
- Recurrent hump was significantly more frequent in the standard group, p equal to 0.029.
What it means for a patient
- The hump coming back is the main way preservation rhinoplasty fails, and how firmly the septum is fixed appears to determine it.
- Overall complications were low, at about 1 in 29 patients across both techniques combined.
- Follow up averaged under 10 months, and hump recurrence develops over time, so the difference may widen or narrow later.
- Limits: retrospective, groups of unequal size, patients not randomized, and follow up as short as 3 months in some cases.
Why this paper matters
Preservation rhinoplasty has spread widely with hump recurrence as its acknowledged cost, and most proposed solutions are described without comparison. This study compares two versions of the same step in a reasonably sized group and finds a measurable difference. Longer follow up is needed, since recurrence is a late event.
Terms
- Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: lowering the bridge while keeping its natural surface intact.
- Low septal strip: a band of cartilage removed from the lower part of the septum to let the bridge settle.
- Septum fixation: securing the septum in its new position so it does not spring back.
- Hump recurrence: the bump on the bridge returning after it was lowered.
- Closed approach: surgery through incisions inside the nose only, with no external scar.
- Primary rhinoplasty: a first nose operation, with no previous nasal surgery.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Among the problems encountered in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty are residual hump and hump recurrence. In this study, the authors performed a modification to lower strip resection and fixation of the septum, and investigated the clinical results of these modifications on hump recurrence. Methods: The study included…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Preservation rhinoplasty
193 papers on this topic.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Septum, valve and airway
195 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Closed Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Mestizo Patient: Challenges and Techniques for Nasal Tip SupportValdivia C, Durand PD, Çakir B2025PMID 39876773Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ Optimizing Closed-Approach Preservation Rhinoplasty by Ultrasonic Piezo-assisted Techniques for Enhanced PrecisionGuilarte R, Malzone G2025PMID 39812015Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- ASJ Scalpel vs Electrocautery for Upper Lateral Cartilage Contouring in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative StudyŞibar S, Erdal AI, Okutan MT2025PMID 40972537Summary
- APS A New Tool to Determine the Accurate Lateral Osteotomy Line in Rhinoplasty with PiezosurgeryGuliyev M2025PMID 38926251Full text
- APS Combining Piezo and Power Tools for a Better Outcome in Hybrid Structural-Preservation RhinoplastyRobotti E, Khazaal A, Leone F et al.2025PMID 39117869Summary
- APS Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisKim DH, Jang DW, Hwang SH2025PMID 40195129Summary