rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2020

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2020

Analysis of Nasal Obstruction Patterns Following Reductive Rhinoplasty

Okland TS, Kandathil C, Sanan A, Rudy S, Most SP.

What this paper says

Among 68 cosmetic rhinoplasty patients, breathing scores rose at the first postoperative visit then fell at each subsequent visit, and only two patients had worse scores than baseline at their most recent visit.

Overview

Cosmetic rhinoplasty has been linked to surgeon-caused breathing problems, but few studies have measured this with validated patient questionnaires. This retrospective review tracked two such questionnaires across postoperative visits and compared them with the preoperative state.

Sections of note

  • Retrospective review of adult patients who had cosmetic rhinoplasty at Stanford Hospital between January 2017 and January 2019.
  • Instruments used: the Nasal Obstruction and Symptom Evaluation and the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey.
  • Patients were subdivided into dorsal hump takedown, correction of the nasal tip, and both.
  • 68 patients included; 56 were women; mean age 30.6 years.
  • Mean SCHNOS and NOSE scores increased at the first postoperative interval, then decreased at each subsequent visit.
  • No significant increases in either score for hump takedown, tip correction, or both.
  • Only two patients recorded NOSE scores higher than baseline at their most recent visit. Level of evidence IV.

What it means for a patient

  • Breathing felt worse at the first visit after surgery, which the authors attribute to swelling, then improved on later visits.
  • Purely cosmetic reduction did not measurably worsen breathing in this group when modern airway-preserving technique was used.
  • Two of 68 patients did end up worse than they started.
  • Limits: 68 patients, one hospital, retrospective, no comparison group, and follow-up length not stated in the abstract.

Why this paper matters

The concern that cosmetic reduction compromises the airway has shaped technique for decades, and this tests it with validated patient-reported instruments rather than clinical impression. The finding is reassuring for modern technique. Without a control group or stated follow-up duration, late deterioration is not excluded.

Terms

  • Reductive rhinoplasty: An operation based mainly on removing tissue to make the nose smaller.
  • Iatrogenic: Caused by the medical treatment itself.
  • NOSE scale: The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, a validated blockage questionnaire.
  • SCHNOS: A validated survey covering both breathing and appearance after rhinoplasty.
  • Dorsal hump takedown: Lowering the bump on the bridge of the nose.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Cosmetic rhinoplasty has been linked to iatrogenic breathing disturbances using clinical tools. However, few studies have evaluated outcomes using validated, patient-centered instruments. Objective: We aim to determine the incidence and severity of nasal obstruction following cosmetic rhinoplasty as measured by…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2020
Authors
5
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2020.

  1. ASJ
    2020PMID 32756944Summary
  2. ASJ
    2020PMID 32232381
  3. ASJ
    2020PMID 31675056
  4. ASJ
    2020PMID 32064498Summary
  5. ASJ
    2020PMID 31960890Summary
  6. APS
    2020PMID 31832733Summary
  7. APS
    2020PMID 31485763Summary
  8. APS
    2020PMID 32514639Summary