Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · 2015
Closed Microfracture Technique for Surgical Correction of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy in Rhinoplasty: Safety and Technical Considerations
Rohrich RJ, McKee D, Malafa M.
What this paper says
A description of a conservative method for shrinking enlarged turbinates during rhinoplasty, which the authors report improves the airway with minimal to no complications, and a plan for choosing treatment by turbinate subtype.
Overview
The inferior turbinates are ridged structures on the side wall inside the nose that warm and humidify air. When enlarged they block breathing, and many surgical methods exist to reduce them. The authors argue none is ideal, because aggressive methods damage the lining and gentle methods let the problem return. They describe the closed microfracture as a middle course.
Sections of note
- The paper is a technique description rather than a patient series.
- The stated problem is that patients present differently, aggressive techniques carry significant complications from damage to the lining, and conservative techniques have high recurrence rates.
- The closed microfracture is described as a conservative technique performed without opening the turbinate lining.
- The authors state it provides effective functional airway improvement with minimal to no complications.
- They propose choosing treatment according to the subtype of enlarged turbinate rather than applying one method to all.
- No patient numbers, follow-up duration, complication rates or airway measurements appear in the abstract.
What it means for a patient
- Turbinate reduction is often done at the same time as rhinoplasty when breathing is part of the complaint.
- The lining of the turbinate does real work in conditioning inhaled air, which is why methods that preserve it are preferred.
- Not all enlarged turbinates are the same, and the proposed approach matches the method to the type.
- The abstract gives no numbers of any kind, so the claim of minimal complications is not supported by reported data here.
Why this paper matters
Turbinate surgery is one of the most commonly performed additions to rhinoplasty and one of the least standardised, with a recognised risk of an over-treated, excessively dry nose. A subtype-based plan addresses the variation directly. Whether the microfracture holds its airway improvement over years is not reported.
Terms
- Inferior turbinate: the lowest ridged structure on the side wall inside the nose.
- Hypertrophy: enlargement of a structure beyond its normal size.
- Microfracture: making small controlled breaks in the turbinate bone to reduce its bulk.
- Mucosa: the moist lining of the inside of the nose.
- Nasal airway obstruction: restricted airflow causing a blocked feeling.
- Recurrence: the return of a problem after treatment.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“An abundance of surgical procedures are in use for the management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy in rhinoplasty patients. An ideal treatment approach is elusive, given the variability of patient presentation regarding obstructive nasal airway, significant complications associated with techniques that cause mucosal…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Septum, valve and airway
195 papers on this topic.
Cleft, trauma and reconstruction
171 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2015.
- ASJ Comments on "The Lateral Crural Rein Flap: A Novel Technique for Management of Tip Rotation in Primary Rhinoplasty"Ozucer B, Ozturan O2015PMID 26116747
- ASJ Response to "Comments on 'The Lateral Crural Rein Flap: A Novel Technique for Management of Tip Rotation in Primary Rhinoplasty'"Kuran İ, Öreroğlu AR, Efendioğlu K2015PMID 26116748
- APS Evaluating current functional airway surgery during rhinoplasty: a survey of the American Society of Plastic SurgeonsAfifi AM, Kempton SJ, Gordon CR et al.2015PMID 25631786Summary
- FPS 2015PMID 26579870Summary
- JAMA FPS Post-Rib Harvesting Pain Should be Considered as a Potential Significant Morbidity in Reconstructive Rhinoplasty-ReplyWee JH, Park MH, Jin HR2015PMID 25996279
- JAMA FPS Post-rib harvesting pain should be considered as a potential significant morbidity in reconstructive rhinoplastyMichael P, Kwok MM2015PMID 25996277
- JAMA FPS Reconstruction of the Nasoseptal L-Strut in RhinoplastyKim DW, Attenello NH2015PMID 26432958
- PRS 2015PMID 25811570Summary