Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · 2018
Development and Validation of a Brief Four-Component Questionnaire to Identify Patient's Motivation to Undergo Functional Rhinoplasty
Spiekermann C, Savvas E, Rudack C, Stenner M.
What this paper says
The authors distilled three existing rhinoplasty questionnaires into a four-question instrument covering the domains that drive a patient's motivation for surgery, usable within a short outpatient consultation.
Overview
Existing rhinoplasty questionnaires are long and cover overlapping ground, which limits their use during a consultation. This study administered three of them before and after surgery, used statistical analysis to identify the underlying domains, and selected the single strongest question for each.
Sections of note
- Patients completed the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation, the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale, and the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty.
- Assessment points were preoperative and 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery.
- Satisfaction was assessed at postoperative consultations using a five-point Likert scale.
- Principal component analysis identified the main domains covered by the questionnaires; a correlation matrix identified the items loading most strongly on each.
- Four domains emerged: influence of nasal appearance on quality of life, trouble with nasal breathing, subjective perception of nasal appearance, and the wish for modification or alteration.
- The strongest-loading question for each domain was compiled into the four-component questionnaire.
- The authors state the preoperative assessment allows an estimation of the expected outcome. The abstract gives no patient numbers or validation statistics.
What it means for a patient
- Four questions can capture most of what three longer questionnaires measure about why someone wants surgery.
- Motivation splits into breathing, appearance, how appearance affects daily life, and the desire to change it.
- The authors claim the preoperative answers help predict the outcome, though no supporting figures appear in the abstract.
- Limits: no patient count, no reliability or validity statistics, and single-center development.
Why this paper matters
Understanding why a patient wants surgery is the recognized predictor of whether they will be satisfied, but long instruments are impractical in clinic. A four-question version could be used routinely. Whether it predicts outcome as claimed is not demonstrated in this abstract.
Terms
- Principal component analysis: A statistical method that finds the underlying dimensions in a set of questions.
- Domain: A distinct area a questionnaire measures, such as breathing or appearance.
- Factor loading: How strongly a question relates to the domain it belongs to.
- Likert scale: A response scale with ordered options, here five points.
- Functional rhinoplasty: Nasal surgery aimed at breathing as well as appearance.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Outcome of functional rhinoplasty depends on different domains such as functional and aesthetic improvement. The aim of this study was to develop a brief and comprehensible questionnaire to identify patient motivation to undergo rhinoplasty and to measure the outcome of an intervention within a short time during…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2018.
- FPS Functional Compromise in the Middle Vault in the Management of Revision RhinoplastyWang L, Friedman O2018PMID 29857333Summary
- FPS Clin Septal Extension Graft in Asian RhinoplastyHwang NH, Dhong ES2018PMID 30005789Summary
- JAMA FPS Association Between Mental Health Status and Patient Satisfaction With the Functional Outcomes of RhinoplastyStrazdins E, Nie YF, Ramli R et al.2018PMID 29450446Summary
- JAMA FPS Long-term Outcomes of Subtotal Septal Reconstruction in RhinoplastyAsher SA, Kakodkar AS, Toriumi DM2018PMID 28910438Summary
- JAMA FPS The 10-Item Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for Functional and Cosmetic RhinoplastyMoubayed SP, Ioannidis JPA, Saltychev M et al.2018PMID 28880988Summary
- JAMA FPS Use of Routine Prospective Functional and Aesthetic Patient Satisfaction Measurements in Secondary Cleft Lip Rhinoplastyvan Zijl FVWJ, Versnel S, van der Poel EF et al.2018PMID 30326520Summary
- PRS 2018PMID 29608514
- PRS Reply: Primary Septal Cartilage Graft for the Unilateral Cleft RhinoplastyLu TC, Lin S, Chen PK2018PMID 29608516