rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · 2018

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2018

Development and Validation of a Brief Four-Component Questionnaire to Identify Patient's Motivation to Undergo Functional Rhinoplasty

Spiekermann C, Savvas E, Rudack C, Stenner M.

What this paper says

The authors distilled three existing rhinoplasty questionnaires into a four-question instrument covering the domains that drive a patient's motivation for surgery, usable within a short outpatient consultation.

Overview

Existing rhinoplasty questionnaires are long and cover overlapping ground, which limits their use during a consultation. This study administered three of them before and after surgery, used statistical analysis to identify the underlying domains, and selected the single strongest question for each.

Sections of note

  • Patients completed the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation, the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale, and the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty.
  • Assessment points were preoperative and 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery.
  • Satisfaction was assessed at postoperative consultations using a five-point Likert scale.
  • Principal component analysis identified the main domains covered by the questionnaires; a correlation matrix identified the items loading most strongly on each.
  • Four domains emerged: influence of nasal appearance on quality of life, trouble with nasal breathing, subjective perception of nasal appearance, and the wish for modification or alteration.
  • The strongest-loading question for each domain was compiled into the four-component questionnaire.
  • The authors state the preoperative assessment allows an estimation of the expected outcome. The abstract gives no patient numbers or validation statistics.

What it means for a patient

  • Four questions can capture most of what three longer questionnaires measure about why someone wants surgery.
  • Motivation splits into breathing, appearance, how appearance affects daily life, and the desire to change it.
  • The authors claim the preoperative answers help predict the outcome, though no supporting figures appear in the abstract.
  • Limits: no patient count, no reliability or validity statistics, and single-center development.

Why this paper matters

Understanding why a patient wants surgery is the recognized predictor of whether they will be satisfied, but long instruments are impractical in clinic. A four-question version could be used routinely. Whether it predicts outcome as claimed is not demonstrated in this abstract.

Terms

  • Principal component analysis: A statistical method that finds the underlying dimensions in a set of questions.
  • Domain: A distinct area a questionnaire measures, such as breathing or appearance.
  • Factor loading: How strongly a question relates to the domain it belongs to.
  • Likert scale: A response scale with ordered options, here five points.
  • Functional rhinoplasty: Nasal surgery aimed at breathing as well as appearance.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Outcome of functional rhinoplasty depends on different domains such as functional and aesthetic improvement. The aim of this study was to develop a brief and comprehensible questionnaire to identify patient motivation to undergo rhinoplasty and to measure the outcome of an intervention within a short time during…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2018
Authors
4
Type
Journal Article, Validation Study
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2018.

  1. FPS
    2018PMID 29857333Summary
  2. FPS Clin
    2018PMID 30005789Summary
  3. JAMA FPS
    2018PMID 29450446Summary
  4. JAMA FPS
    2018PMID 28910438Summary
  5. JAMA FPS
    2018PMID 28880988Summary
  6. JAMA FPS
    2018PMID 30326520Summary
  7. PRS
    2018PMID 29608514
  8. PRS
    2018PMID 29608516