Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · 2024
Augmented Virtual Examination for Cosmetic and Functional Rhinoplasty
Shomorony A, Weitzman R, Chen YH, Liao D, Sclafani AP.
What this paper says
In 20 healthy subjects who examined their own noses with a scope and webcam under remote guidance, only two internal structures were seen better in person, and external features were detected equally well.
Overview
Telemedicine consultations for nasal complaints have not been rigorously tested for how much a doctor can actually see. The authors compared remote endoscopic and external nasal examination against in-person evaluation. Twenty healthy subjects performed a nasal self examination with an endoscope and webcam while guided over videoconference, then underwent an in-person examination and were surveyed about the experience.
Sections of note
- Design: comparison study in 20 healthy volunteers, not patients seeking surgery.
- Median subject age 27.5 years, range 23 to 77.
- Agreement between raters, measured by kappa, was 0.78 for in-person and 0.66 for virtual evaluations.
- Only the internal nasal valve and the inferior turbinate were better visualized in person.
- No differences were found in detecting external nasal features between in-person and virtual examination.
- Subjects rated their average likelihood of recommending the technology at 8.65 out of 10, standard deviation 1.4.
- Statistical comparison used Wilcoxon and chi-square tests.
What it means for a patient
- A guided remote examination captured most of what an in-person visit did, including all the external features that matter for appearance planning.
- The two structures seen worse remotely, the internal valve and the inferior turbinate, are both central to breathing assessment, so a functional evaluation may still need an office visit.
- Subjects were healthy volunteers, not people with nasal deformities or blockage, so detection of actual abnormalities was not tested.
- Limits: 20 subjects, healthy noses only, and the technique requires the patient to have an endoscope at home.
Why this paper matters
Remote consultation expanded rapidly and then persisted, but for nasal surgery it has been used without evidence that the examination is adequate. This study puts a boundary on what can and cannot be seen. Whether the same holds for patients with real pathology is unanswered.
Terms
- Telemedicine: clinical care delivered remotely by video or phone.
- Nasal endoscopy: examining the inside of the nose with a lighted telescope.
- Internal nasal valve: the narrowest part of the nasal airway, just inside the nose.
- Inferior turbinate: the lowest of the shelf like structures inside the nose that humidify air.
- Anterior rhinoscopy: looking into the front of the nose with a speculum and light.
- Kappa coefficient: a statistic measuring rater agreement beyond chance.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Few studies have critically evaluated the quality of data obtained during telemedical evaluations of patients with nasal complaints. Objective: To compare the quality of data provided by remote endoscopic and external nasal examination with those by in-person evaluations for rhinoplasty and functional nasal surgery,…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2024.
- ASJ Comparison of Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Spreader Flap Rhinoplasty: A Randomized TrialZarei R, Most SP, Amali A et al.2024PMID 38366551Summary
- ASJ Simultaneous Rhinoplasty and Septal Perforation Repair Using the Bone-Cartilaginous UnitSazgar AA, Sazgar MA, Zarringhalam MA et al.2024PMID 38648541Summary
- APS A Retrospective Study on the Reconstruction of Nasal Septal Mucosal Defects after Asian RhinoplastyDeng Y, Wang X, Qiao Z et al.2024PMID 37749417Summary
- APS Comparison of Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcomes Between Patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Normal IndividualsMoosaie F, Javankiani S, Mansournia MA et al.2024PMID 38575764Summary
- APS Optimizing Postoperative Care in Rhinoplasty and Septoplasty: A Review of the Role of Nasal Packing and Alternatives in Complication ManagementCaimi E, Balza A, Vaccari S et al.2024PMID 38485786Summary
- APS Rhinoplasty with Mortise-Tenon Cartilaginous Framework for Caudal Septal Cartilage DefectsZhang X, Song Z, Xu Y et al.2024PMID 37945758Summary
- APS The Effect of Functional Rhinoplasty on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisChen K, Zhou L2024PMID 37173413Summary
- APS Tip Support in the Cleft Lip Rhinoplasty: A Comparison of Septal Extension Graft and Columellar Strut GraftAcil MF, Kucukguven A, Calis M et al.2024PMID 37567945Summary