Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · 2023
Preservation Rhinoplasty: A New Approach to Mestizo Noses
Anco N, Caballero G, Adrianzen G.
What this paper says
In 14 mestizo patients in Lima, Peru, satisfaction scores one year after preservation rhinoplasty rose from a mean of 12 to a mean of 30 on a validated Spanish questionnaire.
Overview
Preservation rhinoplasty keeps the natural bridge and structures rather than removing and rebuilding them, and the authors state its use on mestizo noses is poorly documented. Mestizo noses typically have thicker skin, weaker cartilage and a wider base than the noses these techniques were developed for. The authors measured satisfaction one year after surgery in patients operated on at the Higuereta Clinic in Lima.
Sections of note
- Design: single group case series, 14 patients operated between March and July 2021, assessed at one year.
- Patients: 3 men and 11 women.
- Instrument: the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation, a Likert type questionnaire validated in Spanish.
- Before surgery: minimum score 6, maximum 21, mean 12.
- One year after surgery: minimum score 28, maximum 30, mean 30.
- Change per patient: minimum 9, maximum 23, mean 17, p less than 0.001.
- Note the postoperative maximum of 30 equals the reported mean of 30, so nearly every patient scored at or near the ceiling of the scale.
What it means for a patient
- Satisfaction was very high one year after surgery in this small group, with scores clustered at the top of the questionnaire.
- Scores near the maximum of a scale limit what can be learned, since the questionnaire cannot distinguish between good and excellent once it saturates.
- Limits: 14 patients, one clinic, no comparison group, satisfaction only, and no photographic measurement, breathing scores or complication data.
- Skin thickness matters here. Preservation techniques behave differently under thick skin, which is one reason this population was studied separately.
Why this paper matters
Most preservation rhinoplasty literature comes from European and Turkish practices operating on thinner skinned noses, and technique results do not transfer automatically across populations. Documenting outcomes in mestizo patients fills a real gap. Fourteen patients with satisfaction data alone cannot establish that preservation suits these noses; comparative work with objective measures is needed.
Terms
- Preservation rhinoplasty: reshaping that keeps native nasal structures rather than removing and rebuilding them.
- Mestizo nose: a nasal type described in Latin American practice, typically with thicker skin and a wider base.
- Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation: a patient questionnaire scoring satisfaction with the nose.
- Likert scale: a response format where patients choose along a graded range of agreement.
- Ceiling effect: clustering of scores at the top of a scale, which hides differences between patients.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Preservation rhinoplasty is a widely used technique; however, its use on mestizo noses is poorly documented. Our objective was to assess the level of satisfaction of our mestizo patients 1 year after their preservation rhinoplasty.
Methods: The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), a Likert-type questionnaire validated in Spanish, was used to assess the level of satisfaction of 14 mestizo patients who underwent preservation rhinoplasty from March to July 2021 at 1 year after their surgery at the Higuereta Clinic in Lima, Peru.
Results: The study included 14 patients, three men and 11 women, who underwent preservation rhinoplasty. A presurgical ROE questionnaire was applied, presenting a minimum value of 6, a maximum value of 21, and a mean of 12. When applied 1 year after surgery, the same ROE questionnaire presented a minimum value of 28, a maximum value of 30, and a mean of 30. The variation had a minimum value of 9 and a maximum value of 23, with a mean of 17 (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Preservation rhinoplasty can be successfully implemented in mestizo noses with good aesthetic results.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Preservation rhinoplasty
193 papers on this topic.
Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty
167 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2023.
- ASJ Advanced Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Era of Osteoplasty and Chondroplasty: How Have We Moved Beyond the Cottle Technique?Ferreira MG, Toriumi DM, Stubenitsky B et al.2023PMID 37338117Summary
- ASJ 2023PMID 37707591
- ASJ Nasal Bones Anatomy and Analysis for Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyFonseca E, Baldini N, Alomani M et al.2023PMID 36402140Full text
- ASJ Transection of Pitanguy's Midline Ligament to Avoid Supratip Depression in Closed-Approach, Low-Septal-Resection Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyErdal AI, Genç İG2023PMID 35908175Summary
- APS A Systematic Analysis of the Nasal Septum in Crooked Noses and Suggested Treatment Algorithm According to Preservation Rhinoplasty (PR) PrinciplesTremp M, Schneider J, Raghu RBN et al.2023PMID 36826521Summary
- APS Autologous Shuffling Lipo-Aspirated Fat Combined Mechanical Stretch in Revision Rhinoplasty for Severe Contractures in Asian PatientsAn Y, Wang G, Shang Y et al.2023PMID 35606536Summary
- APS Common Dorsal Flaws Following Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systemic AnalysisGuyuron B, Wells MW, Chang IA et al.2023PMID 37328654Summary
- APS Comparison in Patient Satisfaction Between Structural Component and Hybrid T-bar Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort StudyVerkest V, Pingnet L, Van Hout G et al.2023PMID 37069352Summary