Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · Complications and management · 2022
Long-Term Resorption Rate of Autogenous Onlay Graft in East Asian Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Study
Lee TY, Lee KI, Dhong ES, Jeong SH, Kim DW, Han SK.
What this paper says
Comparing three types of the patient's own tissue used to build up the upper nose, at least 50 percent of the graft was absorbed in almost all groups over long term follow up.
Overview
The patient's own tissue is the preferred graft material in rhinoplasty, but how much is absorbed over time is disputed and long term studies are rare. This study assessed resorption of different graft types on the upper third of the nose, reviewing patients who had bridge augmentation with their own tissue between 2009 and 2018.
Sections of note
- Retrospective record review; therapeutic level of evidence III.
- Grafts were grouped into three: rolled superficial mastoid fascia, diced cartilage wrapped with superficial mastoid fascia, and rolled sacral dermis.
- Before and after photographs were used to assess resorption rates and projection.
- The rolled sacral dermis group showed a steep initial rise in projection followed by a sharp decrease over long term follow up.
- Significant trend differences were found at the rhinion and at the half nasion to rhinion point, both P less than 0.001, but not at the nasion.
- The rolled sacral dermis group showed the most projection, followed by diced cartilage wrapped in fascia.
- The highest resorption rate was in the rolled superficial mastoid fascia group, P less than 0.001.
- Between the other two, rolled sacral dermis resorbed more than diced cartilage in fascia.
What it means for a patient
- At least half the added height was lost in almost every group, whatever material was used.
- Fascia alone resorbed most; diced cartilage wrapped in fascia held up best of the three.
- Dermis produced the largest immediate rise but the sharpest later loss.
- Measurements came from photographs, and the abstract states neither patient numbers nor follow up length.
Why this paper matters
Bridge augmentation is judged years after surgery, and resorption determines whether the result holds. This study measures it across three common materials over an extended period. The absence of stated patient numbers and follow up length limits how far the figures can be applied.
Terms
- Onlay graft: material laid on the bridge to add height.
- Resorption: gradual absorption and loss of graft material by the body.
- Superficial mastoid fascia: a fascia layer taken from behind the ear.
- Sacral dermis: deep skin layer taken from the lower back.
- Rhinion: where the nasal bones meet the cartilage on the bridge.
- Nasion: the point at the root of the nose between the eyes.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Autologous material remains the preferred graft material for use in rhinoplasty. However, resorption rates of autografts remain controversial. In addition, long-term follow-up studies on autografts are rare. Thus, the objective of the present study was to access long-term resorption rates of various autologous grafts…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Rib, ear and septal grafts
242 papers on this topic.
Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty
167 papers on this topic.
Complications and management
129 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2022.
- ASJ Spreader Graft vs Spreader Flap in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aesthetic and Functional OutcomesKeyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Cheshmi B et al.2022PMID 34864854Summary
- APS A Modified Large-Cap Graft in East Asian Revision RhinoplastyZheng R, Dong W, Han R et al.2022PMID 35577970Summary
- APS Anatomical Comparative Study of the External Nasal Nerve in Caucasian and Asian: Application for Minimizing Nerve Damage in RhinoplastyChen Y, Carr CB2022PMID 34498142Summary
- APS Comparison of Free Diced and Multiple Toothpick-Shaped Costal Cartilage Injection Techniques for Augmentation RhinoplastyGu T, Li X, Yang X et al.2022PMID 34595596Summary
- APS Complications Associated with Rhinoplasty: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analysesWu B, Chen S, Sun K et al.2022PMID 34590168Summary
- APS Diced Cartilage Techniques in RhinoplastyDong W, Han R, Fan F2022PMID 34731262Summary
- APS Disussion: A Modified Large-cap Graft in East Asian Revision RhinoplastyLin SJ, Seyidova N2022PMID 35817877Full text
- APS 2022PMID 35412066