Journal archive · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · 2014
African American rhinoplasty
Boyette JR, Stucker FJ.
What this paper says
This review argues that rhinoplasty in patients of African descent needs a patient specific plan because the goals and ideal proportions differ from those used for the white nose.
Overview
Standard rhinoplasty proportions were derived largely from European faces, and applying them to other anatomy produces a nose that does not fit. The authors state that goals and ideal proportions differ in patients of African descent. The article covers surgical approaches to the anatomic variations commonly seen and lists the common pitfalls. The abstract is short and reports no study data.
Sections of note
- Review article in a surgical clinics series. No study design, patient numbers, results, follow-up or complication rates are reported.
- The central claim is that a patient specific approach is required rather than a fixed standard.
- Goals and ideal proportions are stated to differ from those applied to the white nose.
- Approaches to surgical correction of common anatomic variations are discussed.
- Common pitfalls are outlined, without being named in the abstract.
- No technique names, measurements or outcome figures appear in the abstract.
What it means for a patient
- The target shape should follow the patient's own face rather than a single published ideal.
- Anatomy in this group commonly differs in bridge height, tip support and nostril width, so the operative plan differs accordingly.
- The abstract gives no outcome data, so nothing here shows how often the described approaches succeed.
- Review articles reflect the authors' practice and reading, not measured comparison between methods.
Why this paper matters
The literature on rhinoplasty proportions carried a long standing bias toward European faces, and articles of this kind exist to correct it for individual populations. What remains unanswered is whether population specific planning yields measurably better results, how much variation exists within any one group, and how surgeons should judge proportion when the published norms do not apply.
Terms
- Ideal proportions: the published measurements a surgeon aims for when reshaping a nose.
- Anatomic variation: normal differences in structure between individuals or populations.
- Patient specific approach: planning based on the individual face rather than a fixed standard.
- Pitfall: a predictable way a procedure goes wrong.
- Ethnic rhinoplasty: surgery planned around the anatomy and aesthetic norms of a specific population.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Rhinoplasty in patients of African descent requires a patient-specific approach, because the goals and ideal proportions differ from the white nose. This article discusses approaches to surgical correction of common anatomic variations. In addition, common pitfalls are…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2014.
- ASJ Preoperative computer simulation for Asian rhinoplasty patients: analysis of accuracy and patient preferenceYu MS, Jang YJ2014PMID 25158684Summary
- APS Combined alloplastic implant and autologous dermis graft for nasal augmentation rhinoplasty in AsiansOmranifard M2014PMID 25028110
- APS 2014PMID 24788856Summary
- FPS Perspectives in asian rhinoplastyJang YJ, Yi JS2014PMID 24810123Summary
- FPS Revision rhinoplasty in ethnic patients: pollybeak deformity and persistent bulbous tipSlupchynskyj O, Rahimi M2014PMID 25076457Summary
- FPS Clin Rhinoplasty in the Asian noseJang YJ, Alfanta EM2014PMID 25049122Summary
- FPS Clin 2014PMID 25049124Summary
- FPS Clin 2014PMID 25049121Summary