Journal archive · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · 2018
Cleft Rhinoplasty: Strategies for the Multiply Operated Nose
Hsieh TY, Dedhia R, Tollefson TT.
What this paper says
A review of revision cleft rhinoplasty, stating that the cleft nose cannot be treated in isolation because lip muscle and scar, bite alignment, and upper jaw deficiency all contribute to its shape.
Overview
People born with a cleft usually have several nose operations, and each one leaves scars, grafts, and altered tissue behind. This article describes the authors' preferred approach to the nose that has been operated on repeatedly, and the surrounding problems that must be assessed alongside it.
Sections of note
- Revision cleft rhinoplasty is described as a further tier of difficulty beyond standard rhinoplasty.
- Symmetry, proportions, and definition are affected by the original cleft deformity plus previous surgical scars, cartilage grafts, and skin excisions.
- The preferred approach uses structural cartilage grafting to establish resiliency of the septum and the lower lateral cartilages.
- Deficiency of the internal lining is addressed with skin or lining transfer.
- Excess thickness at the nasal tip is contoured to improve definition.
- The cleft nasal deformity must be considered together with the lip muscle and scar, dentofacial occlusion, and skeletal maxillary deficiency.
- No patient numbers, outcome rates, or follow-up are reported in the abstract.
What it means for a patient
- Previous operations, not just the original cleft, shape what a revision has to correct.
- Lining shortage inside the nose is a distinct problem from cartilage shortage and needs its own solution.
- The bite and the upper jaw position influence the nose, so assessment extends beyond it.
- This is a review of expert practice with no measured outcomes, so it does not report success rates.
Why this paper matters
The multiply operated cleft nose is among the hardest problems in facial surgery, with progressively less usable tissue at each attempt. Framing it as a combined lip, bite, jaw and nose problem is the central point. No data is given on how the described strategy performs.
Terms
- Cleft nasal deformity: The nasal shape resulting from a cleft lip and palate present from birth.
- Structural cartilage grafting: Placing cartilage to hold shape and resist collapse over time.
- Lower lateral cartilage: The paired cartilage forming the nasal tip and nostril rim.
- Internal lining: The skin and mucosa lining the inside of the nose.
- Dentofacial occlusion: How the upper and lower teeth meet.
- Maxillary deficiency: Underdevelopment of the upper jaw.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Rhinoplasty, as a surgical procedure to improve the appearance of the nose while preserving or improving function, is complicated and difficult to master. Revision cleft rhinoplasty offers another tier of challenge. The symmetry, proportions, and definition of the nose are affected by the native cleft deformity but…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2018.
- ASJ Magnet-Assisted Skin Flap Retraction in Open RhinoplastyÇelik M, Orhan KS2018PMID 30084887
- APS An Alternative Rhinoplasty Technique: Rotational Spreader Flap ("Rabbit Flap")Sirin AA, Erdim I, Erdur O et al.2018PMID 29124376Summary
- APS 2018PMID 29380021
- APS Response to Comments Made on "Alternative Rhinoplasty Technique: Rotational Spreader Flap (Rabbit Flap)"Sirin AA, Erdim I2018PMID 29392358
- JAMA FPS Long-term Outcomes of Subtotal Septal Reconstruction in RhinoplastyAsher SA, Kakodkar AS, Toriumi DM2018PMID 28910438Summary
- JAMA FPS Use of Routine Prospective Functional and Aesthetic Patient Satisfaction Measurements in Secondary Cleft Lip Rhinoplastyvan Zijl FVWJ, Versnel S, van der Poel EF et al.2018PMID 30326520Summary
- PRS 2018PMID 30247379
- PRS 2018PMID 29608514