rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Dorsum and hump · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2012

Arch FPS Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery · 2012

Split hump technique for reduction of the overprojected nasal dorsum: a statistical analysis on subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and nasal patency in 97 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty

Lohuis PJ, Faraj-Hakim S, Knobbe A, Duivesteijn W, Bran GM.

What this paper says

In 97 patients whose nasal hump was reduced by splitting it and saving the side cartilages rather than removing the hump in one block, aesthetic self-rating rose from 3.3 to 7.8 out of 10 and breathing scores improved (P < .001 for both).

Overview

Removing a hump in one piece takes the top of the upper lateral cartilages with it, and surgeons then add spreader grafts to stop the middle vault falling inward. The split hump technique instead separates the cartilage sides from the bony hump, preserves them and repositions them. The authors tested patient-rated appearance and breathing before and after.

Sections of note

  • Prospective study of 97 aesthetic rhinoplasty patients.
  • Assessment by a short questionnaire: 5-point Likert items for breathing and for body image related to the nose, plus visual analog scales.
  • Sum functional scores fell from 9.154 to 6.351; aesthetic question scores fell from 13.897 to 6.825 (lower is better; P < .001 for both).
  • Mean aesthetic visual analog score improved in all patients, from 3.346 to 7.782 (P < .001); mean improvement 4.48 (SD 1.93), normally distributed.
  • Technique: the transverse segments of the upper lateral cartilages are saved and repositioned instead of resected with the bone-cartilage hump.
  • Modifications allow deprojection while keeping keystone strength and adding dorsal width.
  • The abstract does not state follow-up length or complication counts.

What it means for a patient

  • Hump removal can be done without cutting away the cartilage that keeps the middle of the nose open, reducing the need for added grafts.
  • Every patient in this series rated the appearance better afterward, and breathing scores improved as a group.
  • Patient questionnaires without a comparison group or objective airway measurement; single center.

Why this paper matters

The split hump technique is one of several cartilage-preserving hump methods that led toward dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. This is its largest outcome series to that date. Head-to-head comparison with en bloc resection plus spreader grafts is not provided.

Terms

  • Overprojected dorsum: a bridge that stands too far forward, usually a hump.
  • En bloc humpectomy: removing the bone and cartilage hump as a single piece.
  • Upper lateral cartilages: the paired cartilages forming the sides of the middle third of the nose.
  • Inverted-V deformity: a visible V-shaped shadow where the nasal bones end, from the upper lateral cartilages falling inward.
  • Keystone area: the junction of nasal bones, upper lateral cartilages and septum at the middle of the bridge.
  • Likert scale: a rating scale with fixed points, here 5.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“To describe the split hump technique (SHT) and to examine its effectiveness for correction of an overprojected nasal dorsum in patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty. Methods: This prospective study included 97 patients. Objective assessment was performed using a short, practical questionnaire. Investigation…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2012
Authors
5
Type
Clinical Trial, Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract