Journal archive · Dorsum and hump · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2012
Split hump technique for reduction of the overprojected nasal dorsum: a statistical analysis on subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and nasal patency in 97 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty
Lohuis PJ, Faraj-Hakim S, Knobbe A, Duivesteijn W, Bran GM.
What this paper says
In 97 patients whose nasal hump was reduced by splitting it and saving the side cartilages rather than removing the hump in one block, aesthetic self-rating rose from 3.3 to 7.8 out of 10 and breathing scores improved (P < .001 for both).
Overview
Removing a hump in one piece takes the top of the upper lateral cartilages with it, and surgeons then add spreader grafts to stop the middle vault falling inward. The split hump technique instead separates the cartilage sides from the bony hump, preserves them and repositions them. The authors tested patient-rated appearance and breathing before and after.
Sections of note
- Prospective study of 97 aesthetic rhinoplasty patients.
- Assessment by a short questionnaire: 5-point Likert items for breathing and for body image related to the nose, plus visual analog scales.
- Sum functional scores fell from 9.154 to 6.351; aesthetic question scores fell from 13.897 to 6.825 (lower is better; P < .001 for both).
- Mean aesthetic visual analog score improved in all patients, from 3.346 to 7.782 (P < .001); mean improvement 4.48 (SD 1.93), normally distributed.
- Technique: the transverse segments of the upper lateral cartilages are saved and repositioned instead of resected with the bone-cartilage hump.
- Modifications allow deprojection while keeping keystone strength and adding dorsal width.
- The abstract does not state follow-up length or complication counts.
What it means for a patient
- Hump removal can be done without cutting away the cartilage that keeps the middle of the nose open, reducing the need for added grafts.
- Every patient in this series rated the appearance better afterward, and breathing scores improved as a group.
- Patient questionnaires without a comparison group or objective airway measurement; single center.
Why this paper matters
The split hump technique is one of several cartilage-preserving hump methods that led toward dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. This is its largest outcome series to that date. Head-to-head comparison with en bloc resection plus spreader grafts is not provided.
Terms
- Overprojected dorsum: a bridge that stands too far forward, usually a hump.
- En bloc humpectomy: removing the bone and cartilage hump as a single piece.
- Upper lateral cartilages: the paired cartilages forming the sides of the middle third of the nose.
- Inverted-V deformity: a visible V-shaped shadow where the nasal bones end, from the upper lateral cartilages falling inward.
- Keystone area: the junction of nasal bones, upper lateral cartilages and septum at the middle of the bridge.
- Likert scale: a rating scale with fixed points, here 5.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“To describe the split hump technique (SHT) and to examine its effectiveness for correction of an overprojected nasal dorsum in patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty. Methods: This prospective study included 97 patients. Objective assessment was performed using a short, practical questionnaire. Investigation…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2012.
- ASJ A new instrument for rhinoplasty: the osteotome with protector and internal guideKlein D, Hollander L2012PMID 22395319Summary
- ASJ Precise reduction of dorsal septal cartilage in rhinoplasty: no. 12 blade with bayonet forcepsWeinfeld AB2012PMID 22328697
- ASJ The oscillating micro-saw: a safe and pliable instrument for transverse osteotomy in rhinoplastyAvsar Y2012PMID 22738757Summary
- APS Anatomical variations of the upper lateral cartilages and their implications in rhinoplastyde Pochat VD, Alonso N, Ribeiro EB et al.2012PMID 21993578Summary
- APS Treatment of hyperdynamic nasal tip ptosis in open rhinoplasty: using the anatomic relationship between the depressor septi nasi muscle and the dermocartilaginous ligamentTellioglu AT, Inozu E, Ozakpinar R et al.2012PMID 22527586Summary
- Arch FPS Ethical considerations in aesthetic rhinoplasty: a survey, critical analysis, and reviewKarimi K, McKneally MF, Adamson PA2012PMID 22710526Summary
- Arch FPS Radix grafts in cosmetic rhinoplasty: lessons from an 8-year reviewCohen JC, Pearlman SJ2012PMID 22869164Summary
- Arch FPS The "inverted V" technique for rib cartilage L-shaped struts in rhinoplastyPersichetti P, Toto V, Segreto F et al.2012PMID 23165907