rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2014

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2014

Evidence-based medicine: Rhinoplasty

Beck DO, Kenkel JM.

What this paper says

A continuing-education review that sets out how a rhinoplasty patient should be evaluated, which surgical and nonsurgical options exist, and what published evidence says about antibiotics and recovery.

Overview

This is a teaching article written for the American Board of Plastic Surgery Maintenance of Certification programme rather than a study of patients. It walks a surgeon through consultation, planning and aftercare, and pulls current published data into each step. No patient series, sample size or outcome rates are reported in the abstract.

Sections of note

  • Stated learning goals cover the aesthetic, functional and emotional assessment of a person presenting for rhinoplasty.
  • Covers the range of surgical options for meeting the goals agreed at consultation.
  • Covers nonsurgical options for nasal deformity and states their limitations.
  • Covers the benefits and risks of antibiotics given around the time of surgery.
  • Covers common expected events after surgery and how to build a care plan from best available evidence.
  • Written to accompany practice-based assessment, so it summarises existing literature rather than generating new data.

What it means for a patient

  • The consultation is meant to assess three things together: appearance, breathing, and the patient's emotional expectations.
  • Not every nasal concern needs an operation. Nonsurgical treatments exist but have limits the article sets out.
  • Antibiotics around rhinoplasty are treated as an open question, weighed by benefit against risk rather than given automatically.
  • This is a review of other people's evidence with no numbers of its own, so it cannot say how often any specific outcome occurs.

Why this paper matters

Board certification reviews shape what a generation of plastic surgeons treats as standard practice, so the content here reflects the mainstream position in 2014. It signals that emotional evaluation sits alongside anatomy in the standard workup. What it cannot settle is the quality of the underlying evidence, much of which in rhinoplasty comes from single-surgeon case series.

Terms

  • Evidence-based medicine: making clinical decisions from published research rather than habit alone.
  • Maintenance of Certification: periodic assessment surgeons complete to keep board certification.
  • Perioperative: the period immediately before, during and after an operation.
  • Nasal deformity: any shape or structural problem of the nose, present from birth or acquired later.
  • Postoperative sequelae: expected after-effects of surgery, distinct from complications.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss the key components in the aesthetic, functional, and emotional evaluation of a patient presenting for rhinoplasty. 2. Describe the various surgical options to achieve the goals identified during consultation. 3. Recognize appropriate…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2014
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2014.

  1. PRS
    2014PMID 24374707
  2. PRS
    2014PMID 24352210Summary
  3. PRS
    Decreasing nasal tip projection in rhinoplasty
    Lee MR, Geissler P, Cochran S et al.
    2014PMID 25028855Summary
  4. PRS
    2014PMID 25068321
  5. PRS
    2014PMID 25028853
  6. PRS
    2014PMID 24469162
  7. PRS
    2014PMID 24867716Summary
  8. PRS
    2014PMID 25028852Summary