Microbiology and antibiotic prophylaxis in rhinoplasty: a review of 363 consecutive cases
Yoo DB, Peng GL, Azizzadeh B, Nassif PS.
What this paper says
Across 363 consecutive rhinoplasty patients swabbed before surgery, 78.2 percent carried normal nasal bacteria and the overall infection rate was 3.0 percent, with coliform bacteria causing nearly half the infections.
Overview
Infection after rhinoplasty is uncommon but costly, and surgeons disagree on who should receive preventive antibiotics. The authors reviewed 363 adults swabbed before rhinoplasty or septorhinoplasty in one private practice, to describe what bacteria live in these noses and whether risk factors predict infection.
Sections of note
- 363 consecutive adults, 279 women and 84 men, average age 35.9 years, range 17 to 70.
- 174 patients (47.9 percent) had primary and 189 (52 percent) had revision rhinoplasty.
- Preoperative cultures: 78.2 percent normal flora, 10.7 percent Staphylococcus aureus, 0.28 percent methicillin-resistant S aureus.
- Fecal coliforms including Escherichia coli, Enterobacter and Citrobacter were found in 7.4 percent of patients.
- Age, sex, smoking, oral contraceptive use and seasonal allergies did not significantly change nasal flora or infection rate. Adult acne was linked to coliform carriage (43.8 percent, p less than 0.001) and diabetes to S aureus carriage (66.7 percent, p = 0.002).
- Overall infection rate 3.0 percent (11 of 363), 4.0 percent in primary and 2.1 percent in revision cases. Coliforms caused 5 infections and S aureus 4, including one MRSA case.
What it means for a patient
- Infection after rhinoplasty was rare in this series, affecting about three in every hundred patients.
- Most people carry ordinary nasal bacteria, but a minority carry organisms that would not respond to the usual preventive antibiotic.
- Common risk factors such as smoking or allergies did not predict who became infected, so screening by history alone is unreliable.
- This is one private practice reviewed retrospectively with no untreated comparison group, so it cannot prove that swabbing lowers infection rates.
Why this paper matters
It challenges the habit of choosing antibiotic cover by patient risk profile and argues instead for knowing the actual bacteria present. The finding that coliforms caused most infections is the practical point, since standard prophylaxis targets staphylococci. Whether routine preoperative culture reduces infections in practice is untested.
Terms
- Antibiotic prophylaxis: antibiotics given to prevent infection rather than treat one.
- Nasal flora: the bacteria that normally live inside the nose without causing illness.
- Staphylococcus aureus: a common skin and nasal bacterium and a frequent cause of surgical infection.
- MRSA: a strain of S aureus resistant to standard penicillin-type antibiotics.
- Coliforms: gut-type bacteria such as E coli, not normally expected in the nose.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“A practical technique for reducing infectious complications from rhinoplasty would represent an important surgical advance. Objectives: To describe the microbial flora of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty and to evaluate the role of preoperative and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Design, Setting, And…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.
Journal archive by topic
Every topic opens with what the literature says, cited line by line to PubMed.
Papers from 2015
Every paper in the archive published the same year.
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
Papers in the archive from this journal, 2013 to 2019.
Related papers
Same journal, 2015.
- JAMA FPS Broad Tip Modification in Asian Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty Using the Low-Lateral Cartilage Cruciate Overlap TechniqueYin Z, Liu L, Fan J et al.2015PMID 26066901Summary
- JAMA FPS Complications associated with autologous rib cartilage use in rhinoplasty: a meta-analysisWee JH, Park MH, Oh S et al.2015PMID 25429595Summary
- JAMA FPS Evaluation of a newly developed mobile device application for creating and storing a rhinoplasty operative reportSeok J, Wee JH, Jin HR2015PMID 25322254
- JAMA FPS Lapping of costal cartilage technique: a key step in stabilizing and reducing the bulk of costal cartilage used in rhinoplastyJung DH, Joshi A, Chang GU et al.2015PMID 25633160
- JAMA FPS Post-Rib Harvesting Pain Should be Considered as a Potential Significant Morbidity in Reconstructive Rhinoplasty-ReplyWee JH, Park MH, Jin HR2015PMID 25996279
- JAMA FPS Post-rib harvesting pain should be considered as a potential significant morbidity in reconstructive rhinoplastyMichael P, Kwok MM2015PMID 25996277
- JAMA FPS Preoperative Use of Dexamethasone in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical TrialValente DS, Steffen N, Carvalho LA et al.2015PMID 25719757Summary
- JAMA FPS Reconstruction of the Nasoseptal L-Strut in RhinoplastyKim DW, Attenello NH2015PMID 26432958