Journal archive · Open versus closed approach · 2016
Modern Rhinoplasty: Is There a Place for the Closed Approach?
Berghaus A.
What this paper says
The author argues that the closed, endonasal approach still produces better results than the open approach in some noses, and that every rhinoplasty surgeon should be trained in it.
Overview
Rhinoplasty can be done through incisions hidden entirely inside the nostrils, the closed or endonasal approach, or with an added small external incision that lifts the skin, the open approach. The author notes that most surgeons today prefer the open technique for its wider exposure, and makes the case for keeping the endonasal technique in use. This is an opinion and technique review with no patient series reported.
Sections of note
- Rhinoplasty is described as one of the most commonly performed cosmetic surgeries and often elective.
- The author states that accurate assessment of both function and appearance must come before choosing a strategy.
- Two approaches are contrasted: open, favored for access to the nasal framework and overview of the surgical field, and closed.
- Endonasal techniques and their benefits are highlighted, with discussion of situations where they give superior results.
- The stated principle is matching each approach to the nasal condition and the desired result.
- The conclusion is that open surgery is not always necessary and may be disadvantageous in some cases.
- The abstract reports no patient numbers, comparison data, complication rates, or follow-up.
What it means for a patient
- Neither approach is universally correct; the right one depends on what needs to change in your nose.
- The closed approach avoids the small external scar under the columella and involves less lifting of the skin.
- The open approach gives the surgeon direct sight of the framework, which matters for complex reshaping.
- This paper is expert opinion without measured outcomes, so it does not show one approach producing better results than the other.
Why this paper matters
The field has shifted heavily toward open rhinoplasty over the past few decades, and this paper pushes back against that as a default. Skill in both approaches widens what a surgeon can offer. The abstract offers no comparative evidence to settle which noses genuinely do better closed.
Terms
- Endonasal or closed rhinoplasty: Surgery done entirely through incisions inside the nostrils.
- Open rhinoplasty: Surgery using an added small incision across the columella to lift the skin.
- Columella: The strip of tissue between the nostrils.
- Nasal scaffold: The framework of cartilage and bone that gives the nose its shape.
- Elective procedure: An operation chosen rather than medically required.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed cosmetic surgeries and, in many cases, an elective procedure. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the functional and aesthetic issues of the patient accurately and devise the proper surgical strategy most beneficial to the patient. Modern rhinoplasties can be approached…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- APS Rapid Resorbable Sutures Are a Favourable Alternative to Non-resorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in RhinoplastyAlinasab B, Haraldsson PO2016PMID 27251749Summary
- JAMA FPS 2016PMID 26822626Summary
- JAMA FPS Endonasal (Closed) Rhinoplasty Technique: Securing Spreader Grafts With Barbed SutureBradford BD, Asher SA, Ardeshirpour F2016PMID 27197121
- JAMA FPS Polydioxanone Absorbable Plate for Cartilaginous Grafting in Endonasal Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Clinical TrialDayan SH, Ashourian N2016PMID 26501937Summary