Rhinoplasty Results Are Influenced by Non-nasal Features
Wang F, Xu G, Gruber RP.
What this paper says
Using 16 sets of photographs in which eyes and lips were digitally swapped between patients, surgeons rated rhinoplasty results as better when the surrounding face was more attractive.
Overview
Rhinoplasty results are judged from photographs at meetings, in journals, and online. The authors tested whether features other than the nose bias that judgment. They built composite photographs by transferring one patient's eyes, eyebrows and lips onto another patient's face, then had the images rated.
Sections of note
- Pairs of photographs of aesthetic rhinoplasty patients were matched by sex, age, and skin tone.
- Eyes and eyebrows and lips were transferred from a donor patient's photograph onto the original patient's photograph to create composites.
- 16 sets of photographs were rated: 8 originals and 8 composites.
- Plastic surgeons rated the rhinoplasty result objectively; non-plastic surgeons rated overall attractiveness.
- Postoperative photographs judged more attractive were associated with higher ratings of rhinoplasty improvement.
- The authors conclude the objective nasal result may be influenced by non-nasal aesthetic factors, and recommend greater emphasis on neutralizing those factors in before and after photographs.
- The abstract gives no rater counts, effect sizes, or statistical values.
What it means for a patient
- Before and after photographs can look more convincing because of the eyes and lips rather than the nose.
- Trained surgeons were affected by this too, not only lay viewers.
- When comparing surgeons' galleries, features outside the nose influence the impression a result makes.
- Limits: 16 photograph sets, no reported number of raters, and no statistical detail in the abstract.
Why this paper matters
Rhinoplasty outcomes are largely assessed by looking at pictures, and this shows that assessment is not isolated to the nose. It argues for standardizing photographs before publication or comparison. The abstract does not quantify how large the bias is.
Terms
- Composite photograph: An image built by combining features from two different faces.
- Objective rating: A judgment made against defined criteria rather than overall impression.
- Subjective aesthetics: Judgments of attractiveness that vary between observers.
- Non-nasal features: Parts of the face other than the nose, here the eyes, eyebrows, and lips.
- Skin tone matching: Pairing photographs of similar complexion so it does not confound comparison.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Rhinoplasty results are evaluated both objectively and subjectively following any procedure by plastic surgeons and nonplastic surgeons at meetings, in publications, and online. We aim to evaluate whether subjective aesthetics of non-nasal features, such as the eyes and lips, would influence the overall evaluation of…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.
Journal archive by topic
Every topic opens with what the literature says, cited line by line to PubMed.
Papers from 2017
Every paper in the archive published the same year.
Facial Plastic Surgery
Papers in the archive from this journal, 2011 to 2026.
Related papers
Same journal, 2017.
- FPS Auricular Composite Grafting in Functional RhinoplastyRao N, Toriumi DM2017PMID 28753714
- FPS Comparison of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures in Columellar Incision Closure in Rhinoplasty and Their Effects to Postoperative ScarKilavuz AE, Bayram AA, Serin GM2017PMID 29195248
- FPS 2017PMID 28962057
- FPS Interest in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty ScaleNaraghi M, Atari M2017PMID 28388802Summary
- FPS Management of the Cephalically Malpositioned Lower Lateral Crus in Aesthetic RhinoplastyKovacevic M, Friedman O, Riedel F et al.2017PMID 28962054
- FPS 2017PMID 28388789
- FPS Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rhinoplasty Using the FACE-Q: A Single Site StudyEast C, Badia L, Marsh D et al.2017PMID 28962052
- FPS Midvault Reconstruction in Primary RhinoplastyRudy S, Moubayed SP, Most SP2017PMID 28388792Summary