rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2018

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2018

Evidence-Based Medicine: Current Practices in Rhinoplasty

Tanna N, Nguyen KT, Ghavami A, Calvert JW, Guyuron B, Rohrich RJ, Gruber RP.

What this paper says

A continuing education review of current septorhinoplasty practice, covering nasal analysis, patient selection, common complications, technique choice, and the factors behind poor patient satisfaction.

Overview

This article is written as a teaching review with defined learning objectives rather than as original research. It summarizes what is currently accepted in septorhinoplasty, emphasizing cartilage grafting and tip suture techniques, and connects aesthetic analysis to technique selection.

Sections of note

  • Stated learning objectives: perform aesthetic and functional nasal analysis to guide septorhinoplasty; recognize common complications; select appropriate techniques for appearance and airway obstruction; identify factors leading to poor satisfaction.
  • Septorhinoplasty is described as among the most technically challenging procedures in plastic and reconstructive surgery.
  • The field is characterized as constantly evolving with extensive background literature.
  • The review covers patient selection, functional indications, aesthetic analysis, and operative technique.
  • Emphasis is placed on key cartilage grafting and tip suture techniques.
  • No patient numbers, pooled data, outcome rates, or follow-up figures are reported in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • Analysis and patient selection are treated as equal in weight to the operation itself.
  • Poor satisfaction is framed as having identifiable causes rather than being unpredictable.
  • Cartilage grafting and tip sutures are the techniques the current field concentrates on.
  • This is an educational review with no data, so it reports no success rates or comparisons.

Why this paper matters

Continuing education reviews shape what practicing surgeons do, so they record what the field currently accepts. The evidence-based framing signals an effort to ground standard practice. The abstract does not identify which of the recommended practices rest on strong evidence and which do not.

Terms

  • Septorhinoplasty: Combined reshaping of the nose and correction of the septum.
  • Nasal analysis: Systematic assessment of nasal proportions and airway before surgery.
  • Cartilage grafting: Using pieces of cartilage to add support or shape.
  • Tip suture technique: Using stitches rather than grafts to reshape the nasal tip.
  • Evidence-based medicine: Using the best available research findings to guide clinical decisions.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Perform aesthetic and functional nasal analysis to guide septorhinoplasty. 2. Recognize common complications associated with rhinoplasty. 3. Select appropriate septorhinoplasty techniques to refine nasal aesthetics and treat nasal airway obstruction.…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2018
Authors
7
Type
Journal Article, Review, Video-Audio Media
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2018.

  1. PRS
    2018PMID 30252809
  2. PRS
    2018PMID 29135891Summary
  3. PRS
    2018PMID 30247379
  4. PRS
    2018PMID 29369984Summary
  5. PRS
    Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Rhinoplasty
    Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P
    2018PMID 30036343
  6. PRS
    2018PMID 29608514
  7. PRS
    2018PMID 30252826
  8. PRS
    2018PMID 29608516