Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2018
Three-Dimensional Printed Facial Models in Rhinoplasty
Klosterman T, Romo T III.
What this paper says
The authors describe combining 3D photography with 3D printing to produce life-size physical models of a patient's face for use in consultation and during surgery, with survey responses reported as universally positive.
Overview
Digital photographs and morphing software have been part of rhinoplasty consultation for decades, but the result is still viewed on a screen. This article introduces printing that data as a physical object the patient can hold and the surgeon can refer to in the operating room.
Sections of note
- The technology combines 3D photography with 3D printing to produce life-size models.
- The models are used in patient evaluation and treatment.
- Surveys were conducted to assess patient response, and responses were universally positive.
- Early surgeon experience indicates benefit for use during the operation.
- The authors describe the application as new and note prospective uses in facial plastic surgery generally.
- The abstract gives no patient numbers, survey instrument, printing costs, accuracy measurements, or outcome data.
What it means for a patient
- The proposal is a physical model of your own face rather than only an on-screen simulation.
- The model can also serve as a reference the surgeon looks at during the operation.
- No numbers are reported, so the claim of universally positive response cannot be assessed.
- This is an introductory technique article with no outcome data, so it does not show the model changes surgical results.
Why this paper matters
Communication about expected results is a recurring source of dissatisfaction in rhinoplasty, and a physical model is a different medium for that conversation. It also carries the plan into the operating room. Whether models improve either expectation setting or surgical accuracy is untested here.
Terms
- Three-dimensional photography: Capturing a face as a 3D surface model rather than a flat image.
- Three-dimensional printing: Building a physical object layer by layer from a digital model.
- Morphing software: A program that alters a photograph to show a predicted surgical result.
- Intraoperative: During the operation itself.
- Life-size model: A physical copy at the same scale as the patient.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Digital patient photography and morphing software have become an important part of rhinoplasty over the past few decades. Presented is a novel technology incorporating 3D photography and printing to produce life-size models for use in patient evaluation and treatment. Surveys were conducted to assess patient response…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2018.
- ASJ Commentary on: The Nasal Ligaments and Tip Support in Rhinoplasty: An Anatomical StudyGruber RP, Piper M, Chang J2018PMID 29394320
- ASJ 2018PMID 29490020Full text
- ASJ The Nasal Ligaments and Tip Support in Rhinoplasty: An Anatomical StudyDaniel RK, Palhazi P2018PMID 29365051Summary
- APS Systematic Review of Quality-of-Life Measurement After Aesthetic RhinoplastyWähmann MS, Bulut OC, Bran GM et al.2018PMID 30019242Summary
- APS Three-Dimensional Imaging in Rhinoplasty: A Comparison of the Simulated versus Actual ResultPersing S, Timberlake A, Madari S et al.2018PMID 29789868Summary
- APS Trends in Rhinoplasty Research: A 20-Year Bibliometric AnalysisLalezari S, Daar DA, Mathew PJ et al.2018PMID 29717338Summary
- FPS An Unexpected Donor Site Complication after Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Arteriovenous Fistula of the Superficial Temporal ArteryHua C, Gu Y, Jin Y et al.2018PMID 29631292
- FPS Postoperative Care in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty PatientsApaydin F, Stanic L, Unadkat S et al.2018PMID 30593070Summary