New Technologies in Rhinoplasty: A Comprehensive Workflow for Computer-assisted Planning and Execution
Willaert RV, Opdenakker Y, Sun Y, Politis C, Vermeersch H.
What this paper says
The authors present a bottom-up workflow for complex cleft rhinoplasty that plans the bony foundation first, then carries the plan into surgery using printed graft templates, guided bone cuts and intraoperative navigation.
Overview
Rhinoplasty in cleft patients is described as among the most challenging reconstructive facial procedures because of how variable the anatomy is. Rather than starting with soft-tissue simulation of the surface, this workflow starts by reconstructing the irregular bone underneath and works upward.
Sections of note
- The case type addressed is complex rhinoplasty with bony support irregularities and asymmetry.
- Planning starts with reconstruction of the aberrant substructure, called bottom-up planning, rather than with soft-tissue morphing.
- Advances in three-dimensional imaging are cited as enabling improved preoperative assessment.
- The workflow includes detailed planning, use of grafting templates, and 3D-guided osteotomies.
- Bone cuts integrate a piezotome and intraoperative navigation.
- The authors note that previous reports discuss some of these innovations separately, and argue the benefit lies in combining them, with emphasis on transferring the virtual plan to the operating theater.
- The abstract reports no patient numbers, accuracy measurements, outcomes, or follow-up.
What it means for a patient
- Planning begins with the bone rather than with a simulated picture of the finished surface.
- Templates and guides carry the plan into the operation so the surgeon is not judging by eye.
- A piezotome cuts bone with ultrasonic vibration rather than a chisel and mallet.
- This is a workflow description with no data, so it does not show the approach improves results.
Why this paper matters
Cleft rhinoplasty results are inconsistent largely because the underlying bone varies so much between patients. Planning from that foundation upward is a coherent response. Whether the combined workflow produces more predictable results than conventional planning is untested here.
Terms
- Bottom-up planning: Designing the operation starting from the bony foundation rather than the surface.
- Grafting template: A printed guide showing the exact shape a graft should be cut to.
- Osteotomy: A controlled surgical cut through bone.
- Piezotome: An ultrasonic instrument that cuts bone while sparing soft tissue.
- Intraoperative navigation: Real-time tracking showing instrument position against the patient's scan.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
Abstract
Rhinoplasty in facial cleft patients is among the most challenging types of reconstructive facial surgery due to its variability. Advances in 3-dimensional imaging enable improved preoperative assessment in rhinoplasty. In complex cases with bony support irregularities and asymmetry, it is rational to initiate planning with reconstruction of the aberrant substructure (ie, "bottom-up" planning) rather than starting the surgical design with soft-tissue morphing. We present a new comprehensive workflow in which novel advanced technologies are implemented to perform "bottom-up" computer-assisted planning and execution in complex rhinoplasty cases. This workflow enables meticulous planning, use of grafting templates, and 3-dimensional-guided osteotomies with integration of piezotome and intraoperative navigation. Previous reports separately discuss some of these innovations. However, greater benefit lies in the combination of these techniques, with emphasis on preoperative computer analysis, virtual planning, and transfer to the operation theater. Surgeons are seeking new ways to enhance minimally invasive approaches and to obtain predictable and favorable clinical results. The presently introduced workflow allows clinicians to plan complex cases in a simple, effective, and safe manner, with the combination of different techniques to produce consistent results.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.
Journal archive by topic
Every topic opens with what the literature says, cited line by line to PubMed.
Papers from 2019
Every paper in the archive published the same year.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Papers in the archive from this journal, 2014 to 2026.
Related papers
Same journal, 2019.
- PRS-GO 3D 2-layer Elastic Models for Cleft Lip Rhinoplasty Made from 3D CameraUeda K, Hirota Y, Mitsuno D et al.2019PMID 30881815Full text
- PRS-GO Assessment of Rhinoplasty Outcomes with FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module: Norwegian Linguistic Validation and Clinical Application in 243 PatientsKalaaji A, Dreyer S, Schnegg J et al.2019PMID 31942405Summary
- PRS-GO Free Diced Cartilage: Tips and Tricks of a Customized Procedure in RhinoplastyGarofalo R, Pagliari M, D'Ettorre M2019PMID 30859027Summary
- PRS-GO Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: A Graft-based TechniqueSegreto F, Marangi GF, Cerbone V et al.2019PMID 31624669Summary
- PRS-GO Rhinoplasty and External Nasal Splinting: Is It Really a Must?Challita R, Shouman M, Ghanime G2019PMID 31592389Summary
- PRS-GO Skin Necrosis following RhinoplastyMrad MA, Almarghoub MA2019PMID 30881829Summary
- PRS-GO Three-dimensional Morphing and Its Added Value in the Rhinoplasty ConsultLekakis G, Hens G, Claes P et al.2019PMID 30859032Summary
- PRS-GO Unique Uses of SPY: Revision RhinoplastyAmirlak B, Dehdashtian A, Sanneic K et al.2019PMID 31624661Summary