rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2019

PRS-GO Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2019

New Technologies in Rhinoplasty: A Comprehensive Workflow for Computer-assisted Planning and Execution

Willaert RV, Opdenakker Y, Sun Y, Politis C, Vermeersch H.

What this paper says

The authors present a bottom-up workflow for complex cleft rhinoplasty that plans the bony foundation first, then carries the plan into surgery using printed graft templates, guided bone cuts and intraoperative navigation.

Overview

Rhinoplasty in cleft patients is described as among the most challenging reconstructive facial procedures because of how variable the anatomy is. Rather than starting with soft-tissue simulation of the surface, this workflow starts by reconstructing the irregular bone underneath and works upward.

Sections of note

  • The case type addressed is complex rhinoplasty with bony support irregularities and asymmetry.
  • Planning starts with reconstruction of the aberrant substructure, called bottom-up planning, rather than with soft-tissue morphing.
  • Advances in three-dimensional imaging are cited as enabling improved preoperative assessment.
  • The workflow includes detailed planning, use of grafting templates, and 3D-guided osteotomies.
  • Bone cuts integrate a piezotome and intraoperative navigation.
  • The authors note that previous reports discuss some of these innovations separately, and argue the benefit lies in combining them, with emphasis on transferring the virtual plan to the operating theater.
  • The abstract reports no patient numbers, accuracy measurements, outcomes, or follow-up.

What it means for a patient

  • Planning begins with the bone rather than with a simulated picture of the finished surface.
  • Templates and guides carry the plan into the operation so the surgeon is not judging by eye.
  • A piezotome cuts bone with ultrasonic vibration rather than a chisel and mallet.
  • This is a workflow description with no data, so it does not show the approach improves results.

Why this paper matters

Cleft rhinoplasty results are inconsistent largely because the underlying bone varies so much between patients. Planning from that foundation upward is a coherent response. Whether the combined workflow produces more predictable results than conventional planning is untested here.

Terms

  • Bottom-up planning: Designing the operation starting from the bony foundation rather than the surface.
  • Grafting template: A printed guide showing the exact shape a graft should be cut to.
  • Osteotomy: A controlled surgical cut through bone.
  • Piezotome: An ultrasonic instrument that cuts bone while sparing soft tissue.
  • Intraoperative navigation: Real-time tracking showing instrument position against the patient's scan.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Rhinoplasty in facial cleft patients is among the most challenging types of reconstructive facial surgery due to its variability. Advances in 3-dimensional imaging enable improved preoperative assessment in rhinoplasty. In complex cases with bony support irregularities and asymmetry, it is rational to initiate planning with reconstruction of the aberrant substructure (ie, "bottom-up" planning) rather than starting the surgical design with soft-tissue morphing. We present a new comprehensive workflow in which novel advanced technologies are implemented to perform "bottom-up" computer-assisted planning and execution in complex rhinoplasty cases. This workflow enables meticulous planning, use of grafting templates, and 3-dimensional-guided osteotomies with integration of piezotome and intraoperative navigation. Previous reports separately discuss some of these innovations. However, greater benefit lies in the combination of these techniques, with emphasis on preoperative computer analysis, virtual planning, and transfer to the operation theater. Surgeons are seeking new ways to enhance minimally invasive approaches and to obtain predictable and favorable clinical results. The presently introduced workflow allows clinicians to plan complex cases in a simple, effective, and safe manner, with the combination of different techniques to produce consistent results.

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Year
2019
Authors
5
Type
Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2019.

  1. PRS-GO
    2019PMID 30881815Full text
  2. PRS-GO
    2019PMID 31942405Summary
  3. PRS-GO
    2019PMID 30859027Summary
  4. PRS-GO
    Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: A Graft-based Technique
    Segreto F, Marangi GF, Cerbone V et al.
    2019PMID 31624669Summary
  5. PRS-GO
    2019PMID 31592389Summary
  6. PRS-GO
    2019PMID 30881829Summary
  7. PRS-GO
    2019PMID 30859032Summary
  8. PRS-GO
    Unique Uses of SPY: Revision Rhinoplasty
    Amirlak B, Dehdashtian A, Sanneic K et al.
    2019PMID 31624661Summary