Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · 2021
Reducing Dorsal Hump Recurrence Following Push Down-Let Down Rhinoplasty
Tuncel U, Aydogdu IO, Kurt A.
What this paper says
Among 150 primary preservation rhinoplasty patients, 8 (5.3 percent) had a visible hump return, and every one of those had started with a hump taller than 4 mm.
Overview
Hump recurrence is a common problem for surgeons learning dorsal preservation, in which the bridge is lowered rather than cut away. This study compared methods for preventing and treating that recurrence. One hundred and fifty primary rhinoplasty patients were classified by hump shape and hump height, then treated by push down or let down. Follow up was by physical examination and photographs at 1 week, 3 months and 12 months.
Sections of note
- 150 primary rhinoplasty patients; mean follow up 12.68 months, standard deviation 1.78.
- Humps were classified as V shaped, 78 cases, or S shaped, 72 cases.
- The push down technique was used for humps under 4 mm, in 67 cases; the let down technique for humps over 4 mm, in 83 cases.
- Eight patients, 5.3 percent, had a visible dorsal hump problem after surgery.
- Of those 8, three had been V shaped and five S shaped preoperatively.
- All recurrent cases had a preoperative hump greater than 4 mm.
- Revisions were 4 push down, 3 let down and 1 classic open resection rhinoplasty.
What it means for a patient
- A taller starting hump is associated with a higher chance the bump comes back after preservation surgery.
- About one in nineteen patients in this series needed a second operation on the bridge within roughly a year.
- Follow up averaged about 12 months, so later recurrences would not be captured.
- This is a single centre series without a randomized comparison between push down and let down.
Why this paper matters
Preservation rhinoplasty is judged on whether the lowered bridge stays down, and this paper puts a number on how often it does not. It ties recurrence directly to preoperative hump height, which is measurable before surgery. It does not establish which added maneuvers actually prevent recurrence.
Terms
- Dorsal hump: the bump on the bridge of the nose.
- Dorsal preservation: lowering the natural bridge instead of removing the hump.
- Push down: releasing the nasal framework so it sinks into the face.
- Let down: removing a wedge of bone at the sides so a taller framework can settle further.
- Recurrence: the hump becoming visible again after surgery.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Hump recurrence is a commonly encountered problem following dorsal preservation (DP) rhinoplasty when surgeons are learning the procedure. Objectives: The aim of this paper was to compare the different methods for the prevention and treatment of dorsal problems following DP surgery. Methods: One hundred and fifty…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Preservation rhinoplasty
193 papers on this topic.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2021.
- ASJ 2021PMID 33141889
- ASJ Expanding Indications for Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty With Cartilage Conversion TechniquesKosins AM2021PMID 32185397Summary
- ASJ Rhinoplasty: Aesthetic Augmentation With Improvement of Dorsal Aesthetic LinesZholtikov V, Golovatinskii V, Ouerghi R et al.2021PMID 33674857Summary
- APS 2021PMID 33469699
- APS 2021PMID 33399951Summary
- FPS 120 Years of Dorsal Preservation in RhinoplastyNg CL, D'Souza AR2021PMID 33621986Summary
- FPS Avoiding Aesthetic Drawbacks and Stigmata in Dorsal Line Preservation RhinoplastyNeves JC, Arancibia-Tagle D2021PMID 33648013Summary
- FPS Biomechanical Nasal Anatomy Applied to Open Preservation RhinoplastyGoksel A, Saban Y, Tran KN2021PMID 33506451Summary