rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Complications and management · 2020

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2020

Complications of Alloplast Rhinoplasty and Their Management: A Comprehensive Review

Choi JY.

What this paper says

A review of the problems that follow use of artificial implants to build up the nasal bridge, listing infection, extrusion, movement, irregularity, absorption, prolonged swelling, seroma and contracture, and arguing that early detection limits the resulting deformity.

Overview

The paper addresses augmentation rhinoplasty as practiced in Asian countries, where the author states artificial implants are used far more often than a patient's own tissue. It surveys the materials in use and the adverse effects reported in the literature as implant use has grown. The stated purpose is to help surgeons recognize these complications and manage them.

Sections of note

  • Narrative review; the abstract reports no patient series, no rates and no follow up periods.
  • Materials covered are silicone, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, porous high density polyethylene and acellular human dermis.
  • Complications listed are infection, extrusion, movement, irregularities, absorption, prolonged swelling, seroma and contracture.
  • The author states these adverse effects have been recognized and reported more often as implant use has become more common.
  • The central claim is that early detection and prompt management minimize the severity of the resulting deformity.
  • Proper handling of complications is presented as key to successful dorsal augmentation with implants.

What it means for a patient

  • Artificial implants in the nose carry a defined list of known failure modes, several of which appear long after surgery.
  • Contracture, in which scar tightens and pulls the nose upward or shortens it, is among the harder problems on that list.
  • No numbers are given, so this paper cannot tell a patient how likely any one complication is.
  • The paper describes practice patterns in Asian countries specifically; it does not compare implants against a patient's own cartilage.

Why this paper matters

Implant based dorsal augmentation is one of the most common facial procedures worldwide and the debate over implants versus autologous cartilage turns on exactly this complication list. The review consolidates that list in one place. It does not settle the frequency of each problem or which material fails least often.

Terms

  • Alloplast: an artificial, manufactured implant material rather than the patient's own tissue.
  • Augmentation rhinoplasty: surgery that builds the nose up rather than reducing it.
  • Extrusion: an implant working its way through the skin or lining and becoming exposed.
  • Contracture: scar tissue tightening and pulling the nose out of shape.
  • Dorsal augmentation: raising the height of the nasal bridge.
  • Acellular human dermis: processed donor skin with the cells removed, used as a soft covering layer.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“In Asian countries, augmentation rhinoplasty is especially common, where alloplastic implants are used much more commonly than autologous tissues. In rhinoplasty, such artificial materials include silicone, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), porous high-density polyethylene (pHDPE), and acellular human dermis.…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2020
Authors
1
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract