rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Complications and management · 2021

FPSAM Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine · 2021

Evaluation of Postoperative Infection Rates in 3084 Rhinoplasty Cases Using Antibiotic Soaks and/or Irrigations

Toriumi DM, Kowalczyk DM, Cristel RT, Caniglia AJ, Curran N, Lombard R, Kerolus JL.

What this paper says

Across 3,084 rhinoplasties by one surgeon, the infection rate was 1.01 percent without antibiotic soaks and 0.08 percent with them, a statistically significant reduction.

Overview

Infections after rhinoplasty are rare but damaging, with published rates below 2 percent and higher figures in revision surgery. This retrospective chart review covered the primary author's rhinoplasty patients from 2002 to 2019. The stated objectives were to describe the use of antibiotic soaks and irrigations during surgery and to evaluate the resulting infection rates.

Sections of note

  • Retrospective chart review of 3,084 rhinoplasty procedures, single surgeon, 2002 to 2019.
  • There were 19 postoperative infections overall, a rate of 0.62 percent.
  • Patients without antibiotic soaks or irrigations had 17 infections, a rate of 1.01 percent.
  • The infection rate with antibiotic soaks was 0.08 percent, a significant reduction against no soaks or irrigations, P equals 0.0053.
  • With both soaks and irrigations there was 1 infection, a rate of 0.49 percent, not significantly different from either no treatment or soaks alone.
  • Antibiotic soaks reduced infections particularly in secondary rhinoplasty.
  • The authors describe soaks and irrigations as safe, effective and well tolerated.
  • They suggest considering them for patients with extensive revision history, trauma, filler, prior infection or underlying disease.

What it means for a patient

  • Soaking grafts and implants in antibiotic solution before placing them was associated with a twelvefold lower infection rate in this series.
  • Adding irrigation on top of soaking showed no additional benefit in these numbers.
  • This is a retrospective single surgeon comparison across 17 years, not a randomized trial, so practice changed over time alongside the technique.
  • Nineteen infections in total is a small number of events on which to base rate comparisons.

Why this paper matters

Infection after rhinoplasty can destroy grafts and require reconstruction, and prevention practices vary widely between surgeons. This is one of the largest single practice datasets on the question. Whether soaking causes the lower rate, rather than accompanying other changes, remains unproven.

Terms

  • Antibiotic soak: immersing grafts or implants in antibiotic solution before placing them.
  • Irrigation: flushing the surgical site with antibiotic solution.
  • Infection rate: the proportion of procedures followed by an infection.
  • Secondary rhinoplasty: surgery on a nose that has already been operated on.
  • Retrospective chart review: analysis of existing medical records after treatment.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Postoperative infections after rhinoplasties are rare, yet devastating on patient outcomes. The literature reports an overall incidence of <2% with higher numbers seen in those requiring revision procedures. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of rhinoplasty patients from 2002 to 2019 of the primary…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
Year
2021
Authors
7
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2021.

  1. ASJ
    2021PMID 31605604
  2. APS
    2021PMID 34085104Summary
  3. FPS
    2021PMID 33715148Summary
  4. FPS
    2021PMID 34082455Summary
  5. PRS
    2021PMID 33370050Summary