Facial Surface Anthropometric Features and Measurements With an Emphasis on Rhinoplasty
Celikoyar MM, Pérez MF, Akbaş MI, Topsakal O.
What this paper says
A literature review compiling 61 facial landmarks and 122 measurements used in facial analysis for rhinoplasty, with figures showing each on the front, side or base view.
Overview
Facial features and measurements are used for surgical planning, communication between surgeons, communication with patients, and evaluation after surgery. The authors state these descriptions are scattered across the literature with no current compilation. They conducted a narrative literature review through MEDLINE, PubMed and Google Scholar, plus citation searching, to assemble them.
Sections of note
- Narrative literature review; no patients, outcomes or follow up are involved.
- Sixty one facial features were identified in total.
- These comprised 45 points, of which 25 are bilateral and 20 unilateral.
- They also comprised 5 lines, 3 bilateral and 2 unilateral, plus 8 planes and 3 areas.
- One hundred and twenty two measurements were identified.
- These comprised 48 distances, 6 bilateral and 42 unilateral, and 57 angles, 13 bilateral and 44 unilateral.
- They also comprised 17 ratios.
- Supplemental figures depict every feature and measurement on frontal, lateral or basal views.
What it means for a patient
- The measurements a surgeon quotes during a consultation come from this body of defined landmarks and angles.
- The sheer number, 122 measurements, indicates there is no single agreed set used across the field.
- This is a reference compilation. It reports no results and recommends no particular measurement.
- The review was narrative rather than systematic, so inclusion was not governed by set criteria.
Why this paper matters
Objective assessment of rhinoplasty outcomes depends on measuring the same things the same way, and the literature has used inconsistent definitions. This compilation is the reference point for standardizing that. Which measurements actually correlate with patient satisfaction is not addressed.
Terms
- Anthropometry: the measurement of body dimensions, here of the face.
- Facial landmark: a defined point on the face used as a reference for measurement.
- Bilateral: occurring on both sides of the face.
- Basal view: the view of the nose looking up from below.
- Narrative review: a literature survey without formal systematic search criteria.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Facial features and measurements are utilized to analyze patients' faces for various reasons, including surgical planning, scientific communications, patient-surgeon communications, and post-surgery evaluations. Objectives: There are numerous descriptions regarding these features and measurements scattered throughout…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.
Journal archive by topic
Every topic opens with what the literature says, cited line by line to PubMed.
Papers from 2022
Every paper in the archive published the same year.
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Papers in the archive from this journal, 2011 to 2026.
Related papers
Same journal, 2022.
- ASJ Commentary on: Computed Tomography Analysis of Nasal Anatomy in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyMost SP2022PMID 34546291
- ASJ 2022PMID 34383036
- ASJ 2022PMID 35511154
- ASJ Computed Tomography Analysis of Nasal Anatomy in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyEravci FC, Özer H, Arbağ H et al.2022PMID 34436559Summary
- ASJ Corrigendum to: Facial Surface Anthropometric Features and Measurements With an Emphasis on RhinoplastyCelikoyar MM, Pérez MF, Akbas MI et al.2022PMID 34791026
- ASJ Evolution of the Septal Extension Graft in Endonasal Rhinoplasty: Long-term Efficacy and ReliabilityHarel M, Shir-Az O, Berl A et al.2022PMID 35554489Summary
- ASJ 2022PMID 35443047Summary
- ASJ Spreader Graft vs Spreader Flap in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aesthetic and Functional OutcomesKeyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Cheshmi B et al.2022PMID 34864854Summary