rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · 2022

CPS Clinics in Plastic Surgery · 2022

Combining Open Structural and Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty

Patel PN, Most SP.

What this paper says

A review of combining open structural technique with dorsal preservation, noting that although several studies report success, few have used objective or patient reported measures.

Overview

The authors state dorsal preservation has resurged because of claimed appearance and breathing advantages over conventional hump removal. The push down and let down maneuvers are the classical ways of handling the bony part of the nose. Many modifications have since been described for the septal resection that preservation requires, along with partial preservation methods including cartilage only techniques.

Sections of note

  • Review article; the abstract reports no patient numbers, no rates and no follow up of its own.
  • The resurgence is attributed to theoretical aesthetic and functional advantages over conventional hump takedown.
  • Push down and let down are the classically described maneuvers for the bony nasal vault.
  • A variety of modifications exist for the septal resection required to lower the bridge.
  • Partial preservation techniques, including cartilage only preservation, have also been described.
  • Several studies report success with a variety of these techniques.
  • Few of those studies used objective measures or patient centred subjective measures.

What it means for a patient

  • Combining approaches means the bridge is preserved while the tip and framework are rebuilt structurally.
  • The claimed advantages of preservation are described by the authors as theoretical rather than demonstrated.
  • The abstract's closing point is that the supporting evidence relies on reported success rather than measured outcomes.
  • No numbers, revision rates or comparisons are given.

Why this paper matters

Preservation and structural rhinoplasty are often presented as opposing philosophies, and hybrid approaches are how surgeons reconcile them. This review describes that combination and then states plainly that the outcome evidence is thin. Objective and patient reported comparison remains the gap.

Terms

  • Dorsal preservation: lowering the natural nasal bridge instead of cutting the hump off.
  • Structural rhinoplasty: rebuilding the framework with grafts and sutures.
  • Push down and let down: two ways of lowering the bony framework of the nose.
  • Septal resection: removing part of the septum so the bridge can settle down.
  • Patient centred measure: an outcome reported by the patient rather than assessed by the surgeon.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“There has been a resurgence in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) caused by theoretic aesthetic and functional advantages compared with conventional hump takedown rhinoplasty. Classically, the push-down and let-down maneuvers have been described for management of the bony nasal vault. There have been a variety of…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Clinics in Plastic Surgery
Year
2022
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site