rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2022

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2022

Three-Dimensional Technology in Rhinoplasty

De Greve G, Malka R, Barnett E, Robotti E, Haug M, Hamilton G, Lekakis G, Hellings PW.

What this paper says

A review of how three dimensional technology is used in rhinoplasty, covering surface imaging for planning, printed physical models for use during surgery, and printed scaffolds for growing new cartilage.

Overview

The authors argue rhinoplasty is particularly suited to three dimensional modelling. Surface imaging before and after surgery provides a platform for planning, patient counselling and objective measurement of results. Physical models produced by three dimensional printing can be used during surgery and for making nasal prostheses tailored to individual anatomy. Tissue engineering using printed scaffolds is presented as a further development.

Sections of note

  • Review article; the abstract reports no patient numbers, no outcomes, no complication rates and no follow up.
  • Surface imaging supports surgical planning, patient counselling and objective postoperative measurement.
  • Printed physical nasal models can improve performance during surgery and outcomes afterward.
  • Printed models can also tailor nasal prostheses to a specific patient's anatomy.
  • Printed biocompatible scaffolds have shown excellent mimicry of nasal cartilage in tissue engineering work.
  • Those scaffolds are described as holding promise for directed tissue regeneration in rhinoplasty and nasal reconstruction.
  • The authors expect such innovations to become common in standard practice.

What it means for a patient

  • Three dimensional imaging is already used for planning and for measuring results objectively.
  • Printed models are a physical reference the surgeon can hold during the operation.
  • Engineered cartilage grown on a printed scaffold would remove the need to harvest cartilage from the patient, but is not yet standard care.
  • This review reports no outcomes, so it does not show that any of these technologies improves results.

Why this paper matters

Cartilage supply and the gap between planned and achieved results are two persistent limits in rhinoplasty, and these technologies target both. This review surveys where each currently stands. None of the claimed benefits is supported here by measured outcome data.

Terms

  • Three dimensional surface imaging: capturing the shape of the face as a digital three dimensional model.
  • 3D printing: building a physical object layer by layer from a digital design.
  • Tissue engineering: growing living tissue on a supporting structure.
  • Biocompatible scaffold: a support structure the body tolerates, on which cells can grow.
  • Nasal prosthesis: an artificial replacement for part or all of the external nose.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Rhinoplasty is uniquely suited to capitalize on different aspects of three-dimensional (3D) modeling technology. Currently, 3D surface imaging of preoperative and postoperative nasal structure provides a platform for better surgical planning and patient counselling as well as objective postoperative measurements.…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2022
Authors
8
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2022.

  1. ASJ
    2022PMID 34546291
  2. ASJ
    2022PMID 34436559Summary
  3. ASJ
    2022PMID 34864854Summary
  4. APS
    Aesthetic Science of Rhinoplasty: Three Principles
    Gruber RP, Holland M, Rochlin D et al.
    2022PMID 35441238Summary
  5. APS
    2022PMID 34498142Summary
  6. APS
    2022PMID 35099579Summary
  7. APS
    2022PMID 34498143Summary
  8. APS
    2022PMID 34676430Full text