rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2022

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2022

Simulation and Artificial Intelligence in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

Eldaly AS, Avila FR, Torres-Guzman RA, Maita K, Garcia JP, Palmieri Serrano L, Forte AJ.

What this paper says

A systematic review of how simulation and artificial intelligence are being applied to rhinoplasty, covering shape prediction, implant sizing, three dimensional reconstruction from flat photographs, and learning individual surgeons' styles.

Overview

Rhinoplasty is challenging because of the complexity of nasal structure and the effect the operation has on both appearance and breathing. The authors note artificial intelligence and simulation systems are increasingly used in plastic surgery, and this review explores their potential uses in rhinoplasty. Five databases were searched and the review followed the PRISMA reporting standard.

Sections of note

  • Systematic review across PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science; the journal assigns level of evidence III.
  • Simulation models were described that predict a nasal shape aesthetically matching the patient's face.
  • Other models indicate implant size in augmentation rhinoplasty.
  • Others construct three dimensional facial images from two dimensional photographs.
  • Machine learning was used to learn individual surgeons' rhinoplasty styles and simulate their outcomes.
  • Deep learning was used to predict rhinoplasty status and to analyse factors associated with increased facial attractiveness after surgery.
  • A deep learning model predicted patients' apparent age before and after rhinoplasty, which the authors state showed the procedure made patients look younger.
  • The authors conclude these systems can assist in planning, decisions during surgery and evaluation afterward.

What it means for a patient

  • Most of these tools support planning and simulation rather than performing any part of the surgery.
  • A system trained on a particular surgeon's past cases reproduces that surgeon's style, not an objective ideal.
  • The conclusion that rhinoplasty made patients look younger comes from a model estimating apparent age from photographs, not from any clinical measure.
  • The review describes what has been built; it does not test whether any of it improves outcomes.

Why this paper matters

Simulation is already routine in rhinoplasty consultation and automation of it is advancing quickly. This review maps what has been attempted across the field. None of the described systems has been shown to change surgical results or patient satisfaction.

Terms

  • Simulation model: software producing a preview of an intended surgical result.
  • Machine learning: computer methods that find patterns in data to make predictions.
  • Deep learning: a form of machine learning using layered neural networks.
  • PRISMA: a standard method for reporting systematic reviews.
  • Three dimensional reconstruction: building a three dimensional model from flat images.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background: Rhinoplasty is one of the most popular cosmetic procedures. The complexity of the nasal structure and the substantial aesthetic and functional impact of the operation make rhinoplasty very challenging. The past few years have witnessed an increasing implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and simulation systems into plastic surgery practice. This review explores the potential uses of AI and simulation models in rhinoplasty.

Methods: Five electronic databases were searched: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis as our basis of organization.

Results: Several simulation models were described to predict the nasal shape that aesthetically matches the patient's face, indicate the implant size in augmentation rhinoplasty and construct three-dimensional (3D) facial images from two-dimensional images. Machine learning was used to learn surgeons' rhinoplasty styles and accurately simulate the outcomes. Deep learning was used to predict rhinoplasty status accurately and analyze the factors associated with increased facial attractiveness after rhinoplasty. Finally, a deep learning model was used to predict patients' age before and after rhinoplasty proving that the procedure made the patients look younger.

Conclusion: 3D simulation models and AI models can revolutionalize the practice of functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty. Simulation systems can be beneficial in preoperative planning, intra-operative decision making, and postoperative evaluation. In addition, AI models can be trained to carry out tasks that are either challenging or time-consuming for surgeons.

Level Of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2022
Authors
7
Type
Journal Article, Systematic Review
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2022.

  1. ASJ
    2022PMID 34546291
  2. ASJ
    2022PMID 34436559Summary
  3. ASJ
    2022PMID 34864854Summary
  4. APS
    Aesthetic Science of Rhinoplasty: Three Principles
    Gruber RP, Holland M, Rochlin D et al.
    2022PMID 35441238Summary
  5. APS
    2022PMID 34498142Summary
  6. APS
    2022PMID 35099579Summary
  7. APS
    2022PMID 34498143Summary
  8. APS
    2022PMID 34676430Full text