Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2022
Update on Rhinoplasty Research Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis
Ri C, Ri H, Yu J, Mao J, Zhao M.
What this paper says
Analysing 11,130 rhinoplasty papers published between 1945 and 2021, the United States was the leading contributor and current research focuses include cleft rhinoplasty, the nasal tip, revision surgery and preservation rhinoplasty.
Overview
The study used bibliometric analysis to evaluate rhinoplasty research and identify its trends and focus areas. Publications were extracted from the Web of Science core collection database and analysed with VOSviewer software for co-authorship, co-occurrence, citations by country, institution and author, keyword hotspots, and the journals involved.
Sections of note
- Bibliometric analysis; 11,130 records collected on April 8, 2022, covering 1945 to 2021; level of evidence V.
- Most retrieved studies were original research articles, 8,309 or 74.65 percent; 1,950 or 17.52 percent were open access.
- Annual publication output increased year on year.
- Research groups in the United States were the main contributors.
- The University of California System contributed most, with 464 publications or 4.17 percent.
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery published the most in the field, 1,248 papers or 11.21 percent, and was the most frequently co-cited journal with 33,894 citations.
- R. J. Rohrich was the most prolific author with 140 publications and the most co-cited with 2,562 citations.
- Identified focus areas were cleft rhinoplasty, nasal reconstruction, the nasal tip, revision rhinoplasty, septorhinoplasty, nasal prosthesis, hyaluronic acid and preservation rhinoplasty.
What it means for a patient
- Rhinoplasty research output has grown steadily and is concentrated in the United States.
- Preservation rhinoplasty and filler rhinoplasty appear as recent and growing areas of study.
- The analysis counts publications and citations; it says nothing about the quality of any study or technique.
- Only one database was searched, so work published elsewhere is not represented.
Why this paper matters
Where research effort is concentrated shapes which questions get answered and which techniques accumulate evidence. This analysis maps that landscape across 76 years. It does not assess whether the most studied topics are the most clinically important.
Terms
- Bibliometric analysis: statistical study of publications, authors and citations in a field.
- Co-citation: two papers being cited together by a third, indicating a link between them.
- Open access: a publication freely readable without subscription.
- Research hotspot: a topic attracting concentrated current research attention.
- Web of Science: a large database indexing academic publications.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgical procedures. The current study aimed to use bibliometric analysis to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate rhinoplasty research and determine the research trends and hotspots in this field. Methods: Publications on rhinoplasty research were…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2022.
- ASJ Commentary on: Computed Tomography Analysis of Nasal Anatomy in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyMost SP2022PMID 34546291
- ASJ Computed Tomography Analysis of Nasal Anatomy in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyEravci FC, Özer H, Arbağ H et al.2022PMID 34436559Summary
- ASJ Spreader Graft vs Spreader Flap in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aesthetic and Functional OutcomesKeyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Cheshmi B et al.2022PMID 34864854Summary
- APS Aesthetic Science of Rhinoplasty: Three PrinciplesGruber RP, Holland M, Rochlin D et al.2022PMID 35441238Summary
- APS Anatomical Comparative Study of the External Nasal Nerve in Caucasian and Asian: Application for Minimizing Nerve Damage in RhinoplastyChen Y, Carr CB2022PMID 34498142Summary
- APS Effects of Functional Rhinoplasty on Nasal Obstruction: A Meta-AnalysisZhao R, Chen K, Tang Y2022PMID 35099579Summary
- APS Ideal Reference Lines for Assessment of Facial Asymmetry in Rhinoplasty PatientsLee KH, Kang JW, Lee HY et al.2022PMID 34498143Summary
- APS Invited Discussion on: Ideal Reference Lines for Assessment of Facial Asymmetry in Rhinoplasty PatientsMaan ZN, Berkowitz RL2022PMID 34676430Full text