Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · 2023
Twisted Nose: Preservation Rhinoplasty with Modified Push-Down/Let-Down Technique
Jasso-Ramírez E, Burgos-Páez A, Sánchez Y Béjar F, Friedman O, Kern E, López-Ulloa F.
What this paper says
Measuring photographs of patients with crooked noses treated by removing a wedge of bone from one side only, the authors report about 80 percent improvement in the angle of deviation while keeping the bridge intact.
Overview
A twisted or crooked nose leans off the facial midline. Preservation rhinoplasty lowers or shifts the bony bridge as a unit rather than cutting the hump off. The authors tested whether removing bone unevenly, more on one side, straightens a twisted nose within the push-down and let-down methods. Deviation angles were measured on front view photographs before and after surgery using Scion Image software, with statistics done in Excel.
Sections of note
- Design: retrospective comparative cohort study. Level of evidence therapeutic IV.
- The abstract states 78 patients with twisted noses classified as type C and type I, then reports 42 type C and 28 type I, which sums to 70 rather than 78. The paper's own numbers are inconsistent.
- Mean age was 19 years.
- Improvement ratio in deviation angle: 81 percent for type C and 79 percent for type I.
- Angle correction was statistically significant for both types, p less than 0.01.
- Most results were graded excellent to good; four cases were classed as bad outcomes, two type C and two type I.
- The technique worked with or without a preexisting hump, and the authors state it is better suited to type C deviations.
What it means for a patient
- Asymmetric bone removal is presented as a way to straighten a leaning nose without dismantling the bridge.
- Improvement was measured as change in angle on photographs, not by breathing tests or questionnaires.
- Bad outcomes occurred in four patients, so the technique does not straighten every crooked nose.
- Limits: retrospective, no alternative technique compared, no stated follow up, and a discrepancy in the reported patient count.
Why this paper matters
The crooked nose is among the hardest deformities to correct and a frequent cause of revision surgery. Preservation techniques were designed for smooth bridges, and applying them to asymmetric noses required a modification like this one. Whether the correction holds over years is unanswered.
Terms
- Twisted or crooked nose: a nose whose axis deviates from the facial midline.
- Preservation rhinoplasty: reshaping that keeps the natural bridge surface intact.
- Push-down: lowering the bony bridge into the face after cutting its supports.
- Let-down: removing a wedge of bone from the side walls so the bridge settles lower.
- C-shaped and I-shaped deviation: whether the nose curves or leans in a straight axis.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The authors present a retrospective, comparative, and analytical cohort study, that aimed to prove the utility of unilateral or asymmetrical bony wedge resection to straighten the twisted nose as applied in let-down and push-down methods. The study involved objective angle measurements preoperatively and…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2023.
- ASJ Advanced Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Era of Osteoplasty and Chondroplasty: How Have We Moved Beyond the Cottle Technique?Ferreira MG, Toriumi DM, Stubenitsky B et al.2023PMID 37338117Summary
- ASJ 2023PMID 37707591
- ASJ Nasal Bones Anatomy and Analysis for Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyFonseca E, Baldini N, Alomani M et al.2023PMID 36402140Full text
- ASJ Transection of Pitanguy's Midline Ligament to Avoid Supratip Depression in Closed-Approach, Low-Septal-Resection Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyErdal AI, Genç İG2023PMID 35908175Summary
- APS A Systematic Analysis of the Nasal Septum in Crooked Noses and Suggested Treatment Algorithm According to Preservation Rhinoplasty (PR) PrinciplesTremp M, Schneider J, Raghu RBN et al.2023PMID 36826521Summary
- APS Common Dorsal Flaws Following Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systemic AnalysisGuyuron B, Wells MW, Chang IA et al.2023PMID 37328654Summary
- APS Comparison in Patient Satisfaction Between Structural Component and Hybrid T-bar Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort StudyVerkest V, Pingnet L, Van Hout G et al.2023PMID 37069352Summary
- APS Comparison of Dorsal Preservation and Dorsal Reduction Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Nasal Patency and Aesthetic Outcomes by Rhinomanometry, NOSE and SCHNOS ScalesAlan MA, Kahraman ME, Yüksel F et al.2023PMID 36302983Summary