Journal archive · Open versus closed approach · 2023
Video-Assisted Septo-rhinoplasty, the Future of Endonasal Rhinoplasty-A Technical Note
Radulesco T, Medawar C, Michel J.
What this paper says
A technical note describing closed septorhinoplasty performed under endoscopic video guidance, including hump reduction and endoscopic spreader flaps, as an alternative to open surgery without an external scar.
Overview
Endoscopic septoplasty is established, but endoscopy for rhinoplasty is rarely evaluated. The French authors describe their technique: a hemitransfixion incision, septoplasty if needed, dorsal reduction and endoscopic creation of spreader flaps, with tip surgery by standard closed methods. No patient numbers or outcome figures are given in the abstract.
Sections of note
- Steps: hemitransfixion incision, septoplasty, dorsal reduction, endoscopic spreader flaps, standard endonasal tip work.
- The authors state the technique has been used for years in primary and secondary cases with improved outcomes and no external scars.
- Claimed benefits: better understanding for surgeons and residents, preserved internal valve function, less swelling, high patient satisfaction.
- Level of Evidence IV.
What it means for a patient
- A camera inside the nose can give the surgeon an open-surgery view during a closed operation.
- The claims are the authors' experience; the abstract gives no measured results.
- The technique is used at few centres and has a learning curve, as the accompanying discussion notes.
Why this paper matters
It introduces endoscopy into rhinoplasty proper and started a published debate. Limits: technical description, no data.
Terms
- Hemitransfixion incision: an internal cut along one side of the front edge of the septum.
- Spreader flap: the upper lateral cartilage folded inward to support the middle vault after hump removal.
- Internal nasal valve: the narrowest airway segment, between septum and upper lateral cartilage.
- Video-assisted: performed while viewing a camera image on a monitor.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Surgeons have sought to improve outcomes in rhinoplasty through innovative techniques. Although many publications illustrate the advantages of endoscopic septoplasty over conventional methods, few have evaluated the benefits of endoscopy for rhinoplasty. In this article, the authors meticulously describe their own…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2023.
- APS Comparison of the Effects of Spreader Graft Versus Spreader Flap on Nasal Valve Angle in Open Approach RhinoplastyKoplay TG, Inan I, Ozer H2023PMID 37640816Summary
- APS Invited Discussion on: Video-Assisted Septo-Rhinoplasty, the Future of Endonasal Rhinoplasty-A Technical NoteGryskiewicz J, Alameddine KO2023PMID 37474821Summary
- FPSAM Columellar Scar Following Open Rhinoplasty Using Absorbable Suture Versus Nonabsorbable Suture: A Meta-AnalysisKenny H, Jonas RH, Oyer S2023PMID 34516890Summary
- PRS The Use of Endonasal Spreader Grafts in Preservation RhinoplastyGo BC, Frost AS, Friedman O2023PMID 36730568Summary