rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Complications and management · 2024

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2024

Effectiveness of ChatGPT in Identifying and Accurately Guiding Patients in Rhinoplasty Complications

Soto-Galindo GA, Capelleras M, Cruellas M, Apaydin F.

What this paper says

Presented with rhinoplasty complication scenarios, ChatGPT consistently advised contacting the surgeon immediately for infection and recommended monitoring plus following instructions for other problems.

Overview

Complications after rhinoplasty need prompt attention, and patients often have to judge for themselves whether something warrants a call. The authors tested whether a language model could make that triage judgment. Different complication scenarios were entered into ChatGPT, and its responses were sorted into two categories: contact surgeon, or follow postoperative instructions.

Sections of note

  • Design: scenario testing of a language model. No patients were involved.
  • Responses were categorized into contact surgeon or follow postoperative instructions.
  • For infection, ChatGPT consistently advised immediate contact with the surgeon.
  • For other complications, it recommended monitoring and adhering to instructions, while suggesting surgeon contact if concerns persisted.
  • The abstract does not state how many scenarios were tested or what they were.
  • The abstract does not state who judged the responses or against what standard.
  • No accuracy rate, error rate or expert comparison is reported.

What it means for a patient

  • The model directed patients toward the surgeon for infection, which is the complication where delay carries the most risk.
  • For everything else it defaulted to watchful waiting with an escalation option, which is a conservative but non-specific position.
  • No numbers are reported. Without knowing how many scenarios were tested or how correctness was judged, the reliability of these responses cannot be assessed.
  • A language model cannot examine a nose. Any postoperative concern still needs a clinician.

Why this paper matters

Patients recovering from surgery increasingly ask software before calling a clinic, so what these tools say about complications matters regardless of whether they were designed for it. Testing that behavior systematically is the first step. Whether the model misses dangerous presentations, which is the risk that counts, is not established by this abstract.

Terms

  • Large language model: software trained on text that generates human like written responses.
  • ChatGPT: a publicly available conversational large language model.
  • Postoperative complication: a problem arising after surgery, such as infection or bleeding.
  • Triage: deciding how urgently a problem needs attention.
  • Scenario testing: presenting a system with constructed situations to observe its responses.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Postoperative complications in rhinoplasty require prompt intervention for optimal outcomes. ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) tool, offers potential for assisting in postoperative care.This study aims to assess ChatGPT's effectiveness in providing guidance for various rhinoplasty complications.Different…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2024
Authors
4
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2024.

  1. ASJ
    2024PMID 38648541Summary
  2. APS
    2024PMID 38519572Summary
  3. APS
    2024PMID 37452132Summary
  4. APS
    2024PMID 37798488
  5. APS
    2024PMID 38862661Summary
  6. APS
    2024PMID 38485786Summary
  7. APS
    2024PMID 37783865Summary
  8. FPS
    2024PMID 37709291Summary