Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2024
Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Gutierrez RWH, Gobbo HR, Heringer LDFL.
What this paper says
Pooling 11 randomized trials covering 841 patients, tranexamic acid reduced blood loss during rhinoplasty by an average of 39.37 millilitres and lowered swelling and bruising on the first day after surgery.
Overview
Tranexamic acid is a drug that slows the breakdown of blood clots, reducing bleeding. Its role in rhinoplasty has been studied in scattered trials. The authors pooled the randomized evidence, assessing blood loss, swelling, bruising, operating time and surgeon satisfaction.
Sections of note
- Design: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Level of evidence I.
- 11 studies covering 841 patients were included.
- Total blood loss fell by a mean of 39.37 millilitres across all doses and routes, 95 percent confidence interval 62.70 to 16.05 millilitres, p equal to 0.0009, with high heterogeneity at I squared 92 percent.
- Intravenous 10 mg per kg before surgery reduced blood loss by 16.30 millilitres; 1 gram of oral tranexamic acid before surgery reduced it by 61.70 millilitres, the latter with no heterogeneity.
- Swelling on day one fell by 0.78 points and bruising by 1.13 points, both statistically significant.
- Surgeon satisfaction increased, standardized mean difference 1.55, p equal to 0.01.
- Operating time did not differ, p equal to 0.09.
What it means for a patient
- The drug reduces bleeding during the operation and the swelling and bruising visible the next day.
- The absolute reduction in blood loss is small, around 40 millilitres, which matters more for the surgeon's view of the field than for the patient's blood count.
- Oral dosing before surgery showed the largest and most consistent effect in this pooled data.
- Limits: heterogeneity was very high for most outcomes, meaning the trials disagreed considerably, and the abstract reports no adverse events from the drug.
Why this paper matters
Bruising and swelling shape the recovery experience and how soon a patient can be seen in public, and few interventions affect both. Pooled randomized evidence puts this on firmer ground than most rhinoplasty topics. Safety across patient groups, and the effect beyond the first postoperative day, are not covered here.
Terms
- Tranexamic acid: a drug that slows clot breakdown, reducing bleeding.
- Meta-analysis: statistical pooling of results from multiple studies.
- Mean difference: the average difference in an outcome between treated and untreated groups.
- Confidence interval: the range within which the true value most likely lies.
- I squared: a measure of how much studies disagree with each other.
- Periorbital: located around the eye.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
Abstract
Background: Rhinoplasty is one of the most popular aesthetic plastic surgeries worldwide. The effects of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients undergoing rhinoplasty are still being studied to guide a better management.
Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing the effects of TXA in patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The outcomes evaluated were blood loss, postoperative edema, postoperative ecchymosis, surgery duration and surgeon satisfaction.
Results: Eleven studies comprising 841 patients were included. Overall, TXA reduced total blood loss regardless of dose and administration route (MD = - 39.37 mL; 95% CI = - 62.70 to - 16.05 mL; p = 0.0009; I2 = 92%), using intravenous 10 mg/kg of TXA preoperatively (MD = - 16.30 mL; 95% CI = - 29.49 to - 2.57 mL; p = 0.02; I2 = 61%) and using 1 g of oral TXA preoperatively (MD = - 61.70 mL; 95% CI = - 83.02 to - 40.39 mL; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). TXA also decreased edema (MD = - 0.78; 95% CI = - 1.28 to - 0.27 points; p = 0.003; I2 = 80%) and ecchymosis (MD = - 1.13; 95% CI = - 1.99 to -0.28; p = 0.01; I2 = 93%) on postoperative day one (POD 1). Surgeon satisfaction was increased (SMD = 1.55; 95% CI = 0.33 to 2.77; p = 0.01; I2 = 95%). However, there was no difference in surgery duration (SMD = - 0.26; 95% CI = - 0.56 to 0.04; p = 0.09; I2 = 36%).
Conclusion: This study found a significant reduction in blood loss, periorbital edema and periorbital ecchymosis, along with an improvement in surgeon satisfaction. These results hold the potential to optimize the rhinoplasty management by plastic surgeons.
Level Of Evidence I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2024.
- ASJ Preferred Nasolabial Angle in Rhinoplasty: A Cross-Sectional AnalysisAlshawaf SM, McGuire C, ElAbd R et al.2024PMID 37738132Summary
- ASJ Secondary Bilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty: Achieving an Aesthetic ResultSaito T, Lo CC, Tu JC et al.2024PMID 38314894Summary
- APS Chin Dysmorphology in the Primary Rhinoplasty Population: Prevalence, Objective Analysis, and ImplicationsCoombs DM, Hua V, Patel V et al.2024PMID 37430011Summary
- APS Comparison of Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcomes Between Patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Normal IndividualsMoosaie F, Javankiani S, Mansournia MA et al.2024PMID 38575764Summary
- APS Correction: The "Keystone Angle": Geometry in Preservation RhinoplastyNele G, Cavaliere A, Schonauer F2024PMID 38587673
- APS Double Reinforcing Strategy with Perpendicular Plate of Ethmoid in Asian Secondary Unilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Finite Element AnalysisZhang S, Li Z, Zhang C et al.2024PMID 38839614Summary
- APS Hybrid Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: Reediting an Aesthetic DorsumFurtado S, Robotti E, Sousa Vieira A et al.2024PMID 38839611Summary
- APS 2024PMID 38332054