Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2024
Osteotomy Techniques in Preservation Rhinoplasty with an Analysis of a Radix-Skull Base Computed Tomography Series
Neves JC, Abdulraheem M, Neves L, Flora B, D'Souza A.
What this paper says
The authors describe their bone cutting techniques for preservation rhinoplasty and present a CT series of the nasal root and skull base to assess the safety of transverse and radix osteotomies.
Overview
Preservation rhinoplasty lowers the bridge by cutting and moving bone rather than removing the surface, so the cuts themselves determine the result. This article sets out the authors' approach to transverse, lateral and dorsal aesthetic line osteotomies, describing which instruments they use for each. It also reports a computed tomography series examining the anatomy behind the nasal root.
Sections of note
- Article type: technique description with an accompanying imaging series.
- Three osteotomy types covered: transverse, lateral and dorsal aesthetic line.
- Instruments described: osteotomes, saws, burrs and piezo devices.
- Named concepts introduced: transcutaneous ultrasonic osteotomy and microedged-specific osteotomy.
- Drills are described for reshaping the lateral wall, and piezo technology for establishing new dorsal aesthetic lines.
- A radix-skull base computed tomography series was analyzed to evaluate the safety of transverse and radix osteotomies.
- No patient numbers, scan counts, measurements, complication rates or outcomes appear in the abstract.
What it means for a patient
- Cuts near the root of the nose sit close to the base of the skull, which is why safety there is examined with imaging rather than assumed.
- Ultrasonic and drill based instruments cut bone while sparing soft tissue, unlike a chisel, which is the reason for the shift in tooling.
- The dorsal aesthetic lines are the two shadow lines running down each side of the bridge, and reshaping bone to establish them is a stated goal here.
- The abstract carries no findings. It gives no measurements from the CT series and no complication data.
Why this paper matters
Preservation rhinoplasty depends more heavily on bone cutting than conventional techniques, and cuts high on the nose approach the skull base. Documenting the anatomy there addresses a genuine safety question. Without reported measurements or outcomes, the abstract does not establish what margin of safety exists.
Terms
- Osteotomy: a planned cut or controlled fracture of bone.
- Radix: the root of the nose, the area between the eyes.
- Transverse osteotomy: a cut across the top of the nasal bones.
- Dorsal aesthetic lines: the two shadow lines running from the brows down each side of the bridge.
- Piezo device: an ultrasonic instrument that cuts bone while sparing soft tissue.
- Transcutaneous: performed through the skin.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“This study aims to explain our experience with dorsal preservation osteotomies, focusing on transverse, lateral, and dorsal aesthetic lines (DAL) osteotomies. We describe the utilization of a variety of surgical instruments, including osteotomes, saws, burrs, and piezo. This paper describes our concept of…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Preservation rhinoplasty
193 papers on this topic.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2024.
- ASJ Commentary on: Dorsal Modification: Practical Applications in RhinoplastyKhetpal S, Roostaeian J2024PMID 39436834
- ASJ Comparison of Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Spreader Flap Rhinoplasty: A Randomized TrialZarei R, Most SP, Amali A et al.2024PMID 38366551Summary
- ASJ Dorsal Modification: Practical Applications in RhinoplastyZholtikov V, Ouerghi R, Kosins A2024PMID 38992914Summary
- ASJ Preferred Nasolabial Angle in Rhinoplasty: A Cross-Sectional AnalysisAlshawaf SM, McGuire C, ElAbd R et al.2024PMID 37738132Summary
- ASJ Secondary Bilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty: Achieving an Aesthetic ResultSaito T, Lo CC, Tu JC et al.2024PMID 38314894Summary
- APS A Novel Autologous Scaffold for Diced-Cartilage Grafts in Dorsal Augmentation RhinoplastyPensato R, Al-Amer R, La Padula S2024PMID 37610518Full text
- APS Chin Dysmorphology in the Primary Rhinoplasty Population: Prevalence, Objective Analysis, and ImplicationsCoombs DM, Hua V, Patel V et al.2024PMID 37430011Summary
- APS Comparison of Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcomes Between Patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Normal IndividualsMoosaie F, Javankiani S, Mansournia MA et al.2024PMID 38575764Summary