rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · 2024

FPS Clin Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America · 2024

Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty

Carlos Neves J, Toriumi DM, Göksel A.

What this paper says

Three surgeons discuss where they disagree on preservation rhinoplasty, covering how each came to the technique, how far they have widened its indications, and which maneuvers they favor.

Overview

The article is framed as controversies in preservation rhinoplasty, with contributions from three named surgeons. Neves recounts his early career under Wilson Dewes and describes how the techniques evolved. Toriumi, who began using preservation in 2019, describes an initially cautious approach that later widened to include patients with more varied nasal deformities. Goksel emphasizes surgical expertise and individual assessment.

Sections of note

  • Article type: multi-author discussion of controversies. No patient numbers or outcome data are reported.
  • Contributors: J. C. Neves, D. Toriumi and A. Goksel.
  • Neves traces the evolution of the techniques from his training under Wilson Dewes.
  • Toriumi describes starting preservation in 2019 with caution, then expanding to more diverse nasal deformities.
  • Goksel emphasizes the role of surgical expertise and individualized patient assessment.
  • Goksel advocates dorsum-plasty osteotomies and the Ballerina maneuver to improve effectiveness.
  • The abstract names indications, techniques and challenges as the subjects covered but does not detail them.

What it means for a patient

  • Preservation rhinoplasty is not a settled technique. Experienced surgeons still disagree about who it suits and how it should be done.
  • The set of noses considered suitable has widened over a few years, which reflects growing experience rather than new evidence.
  • All three contributors stress that outcome depends heavily on surgeon expertise and individual assessment.
  • The abstract carries no findings. It reports no outcomes, complication rates or comparisons.

Why this paper matters

Preservation rhinoplasty spread rapidly on the argument that keeping the bridge intact produces smoother, more natural results, and its boundaries are being drawn in practice ahead of published evidence. Expert discussions of controversy document where those boundaries currently sit. They do not resolve which approach performs better.

Terms

  • Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: lowering the bridge while keeping its natural surface intact.
  • Indications: the circumstances in which a technique is considered appropriate.
  • Dorsum-plasty osteotomy: a bone cut used to reshape the bridge during preservation surgery.
  • Ballerina maneuver: a named preservation technique for repositioning the deviated bony pyramid.
  • Nasal deformity: an abnormality of nasal shape, present from birth, from injury, or from previous surgery.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Controversies in Preservation Rhinoplasty" explores the nuanced indications, techniques, and challenges in preservation rhinoplasty (PR), featuring contributions from JC Neves, D Toriumi, and A Göksel. Neves recounts his early career under Wilson Dewes and describes the evolution of PR techniques. Toriumi, having…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America
Year
2024
Authors
3
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2024.

  1. ASJ
    2024PMID 39436834
  2. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  3. ASJ
    2024PMID 38992914Summary
  4. APS
    2024PMID 37610518Full text
  5. APS
    2024PMID 38587673
  6. APS
    2024PMID 38839611Summary
  7. APS
    2024PMID 38532200Summary
  8. APS
    2024PMID 38379010Summary