rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2025

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2025

What Makes Rhinoplasty Challenging? Some Answers from 45+ Years of Clinical Experience

Guyuron B, Sun C.

What this paper says

A special topic article drawing on over 45 years of practice to analyze why rhinoplasty is difficult, covering anatomy, expectations, psychological screening and a training system the authors call inadequate.

Overview

Rhinoplasty is described as among the most perplexing procedures to master in plastic surgery. The authors attribute that to varied and complex nasal anatomy combined with the way one surgical maneuver alters the effect of another, demanding precision and adaptability. They add that patient expectations have shifted with technology and imaging, requiring more caution from the surgeon.

Sections of note

  • Article type: special topic analysis drawing on over 45 years of experience. No patient data are reported.
  • Named difficulty: varied and complex nasal anatomy plus dynamic interplay between maneuvers.
  • Named difficulty: evolving patient expectations driven by information sharing and imaging technology.
  • Named difficulty: the incidence of psychological conditions such as body dysmorphic disorder, requiring conscious screening of candidates.
  • Stated training problem: the current landscape of rhinoplasty training is observational.
  • Stated workforce concern: plastic surgeons are ceding cases to other specialties, described as a worrisome trend.
  • The article projects the future of rhinoplasty and what would ensure the next generation is adequately trained.

What it means for a patient

  • Difficulty here is not only technical. Expectation setting and psychological screening are named alongside anatomy.
  • Imaging and online information have raised what patients expect, which the authors treat as a reason for caution rather than an advantage.
  • Observational training means trainees mostly watch rather than operate, which affects how surgeons enter the field.
  • The abstract carries no findings. It reports no rates, outcomes or data of any kind.

Why this paper matters

Rhinoplasty has among the highest revision rates in elective surgery, and explanations usually focus on technique. Naming training structure and patient expectation as equal contributors reframes the problem. The article offers analysis and projection rather than evidence, and the workforce claim is asserted without figures.

Terms

  • Body dysmorphic disorder: preoccupation with a perceived flaw in appearance.
  • Nasal dynamics: how a change to one nasal structure alters the appearance of the others.
  • Observational training: learning primarily by watching rather than by performing.
  • Patient expectation: what a person anticipates surgery will achieve.
  • Special topic article: a journal format presenting analysis or perspective rather than research.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Rhinoplasty is considered one of the most perplexing procedures to master in the field of plastic surgery. Given the varied and complex anatomy of the nose, along with the dynamic interplays between maneuvers, rhinoplasty demands precision, intuition, and adaptability from the surgeon to achieve favorable outcomes.…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2025
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2025.

  1. PRS
    2025PMID 41071182Summary
  2. PRS
    2025PMID 39965161Summary
  3. PRS
    2025PMID 41071223Summary
  4. PRS
    2025PMID 39026386Summary
  5. PRS
    2025PMID 38589989Summary
  6. PRS
    2025PMID 38780387Summary
  7. PRS
    2025PMID 40865067
  8. PRS
    2025PMID 39999233