rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2026

FPSAM Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine · 2026

Features of Importance in the Nasal Exam in Rhinoplasty

Longino ES, Kandathil CK, Ahmad J, Baker SB, Barrera JE, Berkowitz RL, Bhrany AD, Cobo R, Friedman OA, Gryskiewicz J, Hamilton GS, Knott D, Marcus BC, Oyer SL, Patel PN, Pearlman SJ, Rohrich RJ, Shah MI, Spataro EA, Totonchi A, Weinfeld AB, Wong BJF, Most SP.

What this paper says

Twenty-one experienced rhinoplasty surgeons largely agreed on which parts of the nose matter most to examine for seven common complaints, with the dorsal hump case drawing the widest spread of answers.

Overview

No standard exists for what a rhinoplasty consultation examination should cover. The authors sent an online questionnaire to board-certified facial plastic and plastic surgeons experienced in rhinoplasty. For each of seven deformities, respondents ranked the three most important anatomic regions to examine, then chose up to three features within each region.

Sections of note

  • Seven categories: dorsal hump, crooked nose, boxy tip, pinched tip, droopy tip, saddle nose, and nonallergic nasal obstruction.
  • Regions offered for ranking: nasal bones, midvault cartilage, skin, radix, facial profile, lip, tip, septum, internal nasal valve, nostrils, and inferior and middle turbinates.
  • 13 facial plastic surgeons and 8 plastic surgeons were invited; all 21 completed the questionnaire.
  • Agreement was measured with Normalized Attention Scores.
  • All cases showed high agreement; the dorsal hump case had the greatest variability.
  • The abstract does not list which regions were ranked highest for each deformity.

What it means for a patient

  • A thorough consultation should include a physical examination of specific structures, not only photographs and a discussion of looks.
  • Surgeons broadly examine the same things for the same complaint, which supports asking what a surgeon checked and why.
  • This is expert opinion from 21 surgeons, not evidence that examining a given structure changes the surgical result.

Why this paper matters

It is a first attempt to define a consensus examination for rhinoplasty, which could feed training and checklists. The survey is small, the invited group self-selected, and the link between examination findings and outcomes remains untested.

Terms

  • Radix: the root of the nose, the depression between the brows.
  • Midvault: the middle third of the nose, formed by the upper lateral cartilages and septum.
  • Internal nasal valve: the narrowest part of the airway, inside the middle third.
  • Saddle nose: a collapsed bridge from loss of septal support.
  • Normalized Attention Score: the measure used here to quantify agreement between respondents.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“The most critical exam components in patients seeking rhinoplasty have not been established. Objective: To identify concordance among experienced rhinoplasty surgeons regarding the most important exam features for various deformities. Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed to board-certified facial plastic…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
Year
2026
Authors
23
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2026.

  1. FPSAM
    2026PMID 40019820
  2. FPSAM
    2026PMID 40566666Summary
  3. FPSAM
    2026PMID 41958069
  4. FPSAM
    2026PMID 42464436Summary
  5. FPSAM
    2026PMID 42681592Summary
  6. FPSAM
    2026PMID 42068123Summary
  7. FPSAM
    2026PMID 41167652
  8. FPSAM
    2026PMID 42163429