Journal archive · Dorsum and hump · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2026
Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rhinoplasty: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Armanfar S, Ardakani MR, Vahidiataabadi M.
What this paper says
Across 19 randomised trials with 905 patients, ultrasonic (piezoelectric) bone cutting produced less swelling, bruising and pain in the first week and no cases of mucosal tearing, with no clear difference in operating time.
Overview
Piezoelectric devices cut bone with ultrasonic vibration and spare soft tissue, unlike traditional chisels (osteotomes). The authors searched databases and trial registries to 1 December 2025 for randomised trials comparing the two, following PRISMA and registered in PROSPERO. Nineteen trials (476 piezo, 475 conventional) qualified and 15 were pooled with random-effects meta-analysis; ROB-2 and GRADE were applied.
Sections of note
- Oedema favoured piezo at day 2 (SMD -0.92; 95% CI -1.70 to -0.13) and day 7 (SMD -0.64; -1.06 to -0.22), but not at days 1, 3 or 4.
- Ecchymosis was reduced at day 1 (SMD -1.33), day 2 (SMD -1.13) and day 7 (SMD -0.62).
- Pain at day 2 was lower with piezo (SMD -1.23; -1.90 to -0.57).
- Mucosal integrity loss: none in piezo cases; RR 0.09 versus controls (95% CI 0.02-0.44).
- Osteotomy duration did not differ significantly, with high heterogeneity. Level of Evidence 2.
What it means for a patient
- Piezo bone work gave a visibly easier first week: less bruising and swelling around the eyes and less pain at day 2.
- It did not tear the inner nasal lining in any pooled trial, a possible long-term advantage.
- The review did not assess final shape or breathing, so it does not show a better end result.
Why this paper matters
It is the largest randomised-trial synthesis on piezo osteotomy, with formal certainty grading. Limits: outcomes limited to the first week, variable measurement scales, operative time uncertain.
Terms
- Piezoelectric osteotomy: cutting bone with an ultrasonic tip that does not cut soft tissue.
- Osteotome: a surgical chisel used to fracture nasal bones.
- Standardised mean difference (SMD): a unit-free effect size; -0.5 is a moderate reduction.
- GRADE: a system for rating certainty of evidence.
- Mucosal integrity: intactness of the nasal lining beneath the bone cut.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Piezoelectric osteotomy may reduce postoperative morbidity after rhinoplasty but time-based effects remain uncertain. The aim of this review was to understand the time-based effectiveness and safety of piezoelectric osteotomy vs conventional methods. A search was performed of major databases and trial registries from…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2026.
- ASJ Dorsal Width and Functional Outcomes with use of Autospreader Flaps in Cosmetic RhinoplastyJabbour N, Pelligrini W, Shehan J et al.2026PMID 42415377Summary
- ASJ Efficacy of Combined Septal Extension and Derotation Grafts in Asian Rhinoplasty: A Quantitative Analysis of Tip Projection and StabilityHuang CJ, Tsai TY, Yen CI et al.2026PMID 41990353Summary
- ASJ Establishing Normative Data on Satisfaction with Nasal Appearance: a Dutch Population-Based Study Using Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Outcome InstrumentsKasapov M, Afonso PM, Datema FR et al.2026PMID 42670247Summary
- ASJ Postoperative Differences in Dorsal Aesthetic Lines in Patients Undergoing Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty and Conventional Hump ResectionXu L, Huang H, Kandathil CK et al.2026PMID 41369038Summary
- ASJ Preoperative Serotonin Antidepressants Are Associated With Increased Postoperative Complications Following Rhinoplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched AnalysisZontag N, Skorochod R, Wolf Y2026PMID 41672725Summary
- ASJ Reflections on the Evolution of Rhinoplasty and Aesthetic Surgery Journal Over 30 YearsKosins A, Roostaeian J, Stubenitsky B2026PMID 42455863
- APS A Prospective Comparison of Inverted V Mid-columellar and V-Shaped Columellar-Labial Incisions in Reconstructive RhinoplastySazgar AA, Aalizade A, Zeyfoalzam M et al.2026PMID 41998166Summary
- APS Application of Personalized 3D-Printed Silicone Implants in Rhinoplasty: An Animal Experimental StudyHou M, Li H, Guo Y et al.2026PMID 42329445Summary