rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · 2026

ASJ Aesthetic Surgery Journal · 2026

Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Decade of Progress and Technical Refinement

Nissan ME, Kosins A.

What this paper says

A narrative review summarising how preservation rhinoplasty developed over eight years, which techniques a beginner should learn in what order, and the complications to expect.

Overview

This is an expert review, not a study. Nissan and Kosins (Kosins is one of the surgeons who popularised the term) trace the history of preservation rhinoplasty since the term was introduced, describe the prevailing techniques in a sequence a novice surgeon could follow, and list known complications and pitfalls. There are no patients, outcomes or numbers in the abstract; it is graded Level of Evidence 5.

Sections of note

  • The term "preservation rhinoplasty" was introduced eight years before publication and the authors state it is now an accepted philosophy worldwide.
  • The stated rationale: stable results with fewer secondary deformities than deconstruction-reconstruction (structural) rhinoplasty.
  • Techniques are described in a logical learning order for surgeons new to the approach.
  • Textbooks, journal articles and in-person courses have made the methods more accessible than five years earlier.
  • A section covers known complications and pitfalls.

What it means for a patient

  • Preservation rhinoplasty is now a mainstream option, but this paper is an overview of opinion and technique, not a comparison of results.
  • Complications exist for preservation techniques as for any other; the paper catalogues them.
  • A surgeon's training path in these techniques matters; the paper is aimed at teaching that path.

Why this paper matters

It is a state-of-the-field summary by an author closely tied to the movement, useful as an orientation to the literature. Limits: no data, Level 5 evidence, and written by proponents of the approach.

Terms

  • Preservation rhinoplasty: a philosophy that keeps the nasal bridge, ligaments and skin attachments intact and reshapes by repositioning rather than removing.
  • Structural rhinoplasty: the older "take apart and rebuild" approach using grafts to restore support.
  • Secondary deformity: a visible or functional problem that appears after healing and may need revision surgery.
  • Level of Evidence 5: expert opinion, the lowest evidence grade.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Eight years have passed since the introduction of the term "preservation rhinoplasty." This approach has now gained worldwide popularity, and it is clear that preservation rhinoplasty has become an accepted philosophy due to its ability to produce stable, reliable, and beautiful results while minimizing the likelihood…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Year
2026
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article, Review, Historical Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2026.

  1. ASJ
    2026PMID 41369038Summary
  2. APS
    2026PMID 42418006Summary
  3. APS
    2026PMID 42045684Summary
  4. APS
    2026PMID 41345307Summary
  5. APS
    2026PMID 40770501Summary
  6. APS
    2026PMID 42159722Summary
  7. APS
    Roof Modification Methods in Preservation Rhinoplasty
    Tuncel U, Yurtsever OH, Lazovic G et al.
    2026PMID 40797126Summary
  8. APS
    2026PMID 42154257Summary