Dichotomy of rhinoplasty practice: from the conference floor to the operating room
Palma P, Khodaei I.
What this paper says
This opinion article argues that rhinoplasty techniques presented at conferences often run ahead of the evidence, and proposes ways to close the gap between what is taught and what is done.
Overview
Rhinoplasty techniques rise and fall in popularity quickly, which makes gathering evidence and teaching the operation difficult. The authors describe a mismatch between scientific progress and everyday clinical practice. They set out why the learning curve is long and what a surgeon needs in order to judge conference presentations and published papers critically.
Sections of note
- This is a discussion article. No study design, patient numbers, results or follow-up are reported.
- The authors state that advances in technique and clinical practice lag behind scientific progress and peer opinion.
- Rapid turnover in the popularity of techniques is described as an obstacle to evidence gathering and to education.
- Trainees are said to face a long and steep learning curve requiring analytical tools to evaluate both literature and operative reports shown at meetings.
- The authors note that patient wishes are increasingly specific and do not always match what surgeons were trained to do.
- Racial variation in nasal anatomy and in ideals of beauty is described as wide, so a single formula does not fit all cases.
- The paper proposes a practical plan to remedy the gap, without detailing it in the abstract.
What it means for a patient
- A technique being popular at conferences does not mean it has been tested against alternatives.
- Surgeons vary in how they judge new methods, which is one reason recommendations differ between consultations.
- There are no outcome numbers here, so nothing in this article speaks to the safety or results of any specific operation.
Why this paper matters
It names a structural problem in rhinoplasty: technique adoption driven by presentation rather than data. What remains unanswered is whether any of the proposed remedies changes surgeon behaviour or patient results.
Terms
- Dichotomy: a split between two things that should agree.
- Evidence gathering: collecting measured results to test whether a treatment works.
- Learning curve: the time and case volume needed to become reliable at a procedure.
- Operative report: a surgeon's account of what was done during an operation.
- Nasal anatomy: the structure of bone, cartilage and skin that gives the nose its shape.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Advancements in surgical techniques and improvements in clinical practice inevitably lag behind scientific progress and peer-led opinion. The rapid rise and fall in the popularity of rhinoplasty techniques makes scientific evidence-gathering and education a daunting task. Students of rhinoplasty face a long and steep…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.
Journal archive by topic
Every topic opens with what the literature says, cited line by line to PubMed.
Papers from 2014
Every paper in the archive published the same year.
Facial Plastic Surgery
Papers in the archive from this journal, 2011 to 2026.
Related papers
Same journal, 2014.
- FPS Depressor septi nasi modifications in rhinoplasty: a review of anatomy and surgical techniquesBenlier E, Balta S, Tas S2014PMID 25076456Summary
- FPS History of reconstructive rhinoplastyMazzola IC, Mazzola RF2014PMID 24918702Summary
- FPS Management of the middle vault in endonasal rhinoplastyFedok FG, Garritano F2014PMID 24810132Summary
- FPS Open rhinoplasty concepts in facilitating tip reconstructionCarminati M, Robotti E2014PMID 24918706Summary
- FPS Perspectives in asian rhinoplastyJang YJ, Yi JS2014PMID 24810123Summary
- FPS Quality of life in patients who underwent rhinoplastyZojaji R, Keshavarzmanesh M, Arshadi HR et al.2014PMID 25397717Summary
- FPS Revision rhinoplasty in ethnic patients: pollybeak deformity and persistent bulbous tipSlupchynskyj O, Rahimi M2014PMID 25076457Summary