rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2014

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2014

Dichotomy of rhinoplasty practice: from the conference floor to the operating room

Palma P, Khodaei I.

What this paper says

This opinion article argues that rhinoplasty techniques presented at conferences often run ahead of the evidence, and proposes ways to close the gap between what is taught and what is done.

Overview

Rhinoplasty techniques rise and fall in popularity quickly, which makes gathering evidence and teaching the operation difficult. The authors describe a mismatch between scientific progress and everyday clinical practice. They set out why the learning curve is long and what a surgeon needs in order to judge conference presentations and published papers critically.

Sections of note

  • This is a discussion article. No study design, patient numbers, results or follow-up are reported.
  • The authors state that advances in technique and clinical practice lag behind scientific progress and peer opinion.
  • Rapid turnover in the popularity of techniques is described as an obstacle to evidence gathering and to education.
  • Trainees are said to face a long and steep learning curve requiring analytical tools to evaluate both literature and operative reports shown at meetings.
  • The authors note that patient wishes are increasingly specific and do not always match what surgeons were trained to do.
  • Racial variation in nasal anatomy and in ideals of beauty is described as wide, so a single formula does not fit all cases.
  • The paper proposes a practical plan to remedy the gap, without detailing it in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • A technique being popular at conferences does not mean it has been tested against alternatives.
  • Surgeons vary in how they judge new methods, which is one reason recommendations differ between consultations.
  • There are no outcome numbers here, so nothing in this article speaks to the safety or results of any specific operation.

Why this paper matters

It names a structural problem in rhinoplasty: technique adoption driven by presentation rather than data. What remains unanswered is whether any of the proposed remedies changes surgeon behaviour or patient results.

Terms

  • Dichotomy: a split between two things that should agree.
  • Evidence gathering: collecting measured results to test whether a treatment works.
  • Learning curve: the time and case volume needed to become reliable at a procedure.
  • Operative report: a surgeon's account of what was done during an operation.
  • Nasal anatomy: the structure of bone, cartilage and skin that gives the nose its shape.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Advancements in surgical techniques and improvements in clinical practice inevitably lag behind scientific progress and peer-led opinion. The rapid rise and fall in the popularity of rhinoplasty techniques makes scientific evidence-gathering and education a daunting task. Students of rhinoplasty face a long and steep…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2014
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2014.

  1. FPS
    2014PMID 25076456Summary
  2. FPS
    2014PMID 24918702Summary
  3. FPS
    2014PMID 24810132Summary
  4. FPS
    2014PMID 24918706Summary
  5. FPS
    2014PMID 24810123Summary
  6. FPS
    Quality of life in patients who underwent rhinoplasty
    Zojaji R, Keshavarzmanesh M, Arshadi HR et al.
    2014PMID 25397717Summary
  7. FPS
    2014PMID 25076457Summary