Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2016
Bergamo 3D Rhinoplasty Software: Select, Store, and Share Surgical Maneuvers in a Three-Dimensional Nasal Model
Codazzi D, Bruschi S, Mazzola RF, Bocchiotti MA, Bogetti P, Ortelli L, Robotti E.
What this paper says
Software that records rhinoplasty operations on a three-dimensional nasal model, offering 669 figures across 230 selectable options, replacing hand-drawn worksheets used since 1989.
Overview
Rhinoplasty varies so much between patients that surgeons use worksheets to record exactly which steps were performed and how they interacted. The Gunter Rhinoplasty Diagrams have been the standard since 1989 and no newer software had replaced them. The authors built a three-dimensional nasal framework model and an interface for selecting and recording surgical manoeuvres on it.
Sections of note
- A new standard three-dimensional nasal framework model was built in STL format.
- All basic components were modified to simulate how sutures, grafts and common manoeuvres interact.
- 669 three-dimensional figures were created, 99 built-in units and 285 unilateral units, selectable from 230 options.
- The software has a database section holding patient information and documents, and a surgery section grouping selection lists across 10 surgical areas.
- Eighty percent of the options change the shape of the three-dimensional model.
- Results can be exported to desktop software and as a physical three-dimensional printed model. The stated main limitation is customisation of the original model and manoeuvres, given the technology available in 2014.
What it means for a patient
- The tool records what was done in an operation in a form another surgeon can read, which matters if a revision is needed years later.
- It is designed for surgeon documentation, teaching and case discussion, not for showing a patient what their nose will look like.
- Because the model is a standard nasal framework rather than the patient's own anatomy, it does not predict an individual result.
- No patient outcomes, accuracy testing or comparison against paper worksheets is reported in the abstract.
Why this paper matters
Rhinoplasty operative notes are notoriously hard to interpret afterwards, which complicates revision surgery and makes results difficult to compare between surgeons. A structured three-dimensional record addresses that directly. Whether it improves documentation quality or surgical outcomes is not tested here.
Terms
- Worksheet: a diagram used to record which surgical steps were performed.
- Gunter Rhinoplasty Diagrams: the standard hand-drawn rhinoplasty recording system introduced in 1989.
- STL format: a standard file type for describing three-dimensional shapes.
- Surgical manoeuvre: a specific step performed during an operation.
- Unilateral: applied to one side only.
- Three-dimensional printing: producing a physical model from a digital shape file.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Rhinoplasty is considered the most challenging chapter of plastic surgery due to its variability and the continuing evolution of surgical maneuvers. Worksheets became essential to unequivocally record surgical steps and to demonstrate their reciprocal effects/interactions during the follow-up period. After 1989, no…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- ASJ Anatomical Study of the Lateral Crural Strut Graft in Rhinoplasty and Its Clinical ApplicationSilva Filho Rde O, Pochat VD2016PMID 27277274Summary
- ASJ 2016PMID 27535924
- ASJ Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media AnalysisKhansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD2016PMID 26063834Summary
- ASJ Perioperative Corticosteroids Reduce Short-Term Edema and Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-AnalysisCoroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Cook DJ et al.2016PMID 26773090Summary
- APS Safe Planes for Injection Rhinoplasty: A Histological Analysis of Midline Longitudinal Sections of the Asian NoseTansatit T, Moon HJ, Rungsawang C et al.2016PMID 26893278Summary
- CPS Rhinoplasty in the African American Patient: Anatomic Considerations and Technical PearlsPeng GL, Nassif PS2016PMID 26616712Summary
- FPS Aesthetic Rhinoplasty as a Surface-Contour Operation: From Analysis to Surgery-Personal ConceptsPietro P, Iman K, Irina V2016PMID 28033632Summary
- FPS Columellar Aesthetics in Open RhinoplastyKridel RW, Kwak ES, Watson JB2016PMID 27494576Summary