Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2016
Varied Definitions of Nasolabial Angle: Searching for Consensus Among Rhinoplasty Surgeons and an Algorithm for Selecting the Ideal Method
Harris R, Nagarkar P, Amirlak B.
What this paper says
Surveying 82 rhinoplasty surgeons on how they define the nasolabial angle, no definition drew a majority, with the most popular chosen by 33 percent.
Overview
The nasolabial angle is a standard measure used in planning and assessing rhinoplasty. The literature offers several definitions and none is universally accepted. The authors surveyed a convenience sample of rhinoplasty surgeons about their practice, their self-rated expertise and which definition they use.
Sections of note
- 82 respondents, mean age 50 years. Mean professional experience 17 years, range 0 to 67.
- 19 were self-described novices, 27 intermediates and 36 experts. Mean lifetime rhinoplasties performed was 966, range 0 to 10,000.
- Four definitions were offered, using the columella or the long axis of the nostril, measured against the upper lip, the philtrum, the Frankfort perpendicular or the vertical facial plane.
- Choices: definition A 20 respondents (24 percent), B 27 (33 percent), C 16 (20 percent), D 13 (16 percent). Six chose other and gave their own definitions.
- Self-identified novices were more likely than experts to prefer definition D, p = 0.009.
- The authors conclude no majority consensus exists, propose that a single definition may be unnecessary or counterproductive, and submit an algorithm for selecting a method.
What it means for a patient
- A number quoted for a nose's angle depends on which definition was used, so figures from different sources are not directly comparable.
- The same nose can be described as having different angles by two surgeons, both correct by their own definition.
- The authors argue for choosing a method to suit the case rather than fixing one standard, provided the surgeon is systematic about it.
- This is a survey of opinion from a convenience sample of 82 surgeons, not a study of patients, and it establishes no correct definition.
Why this paper matters
Comparing published rhinoplasty results assumes shared measurement, and this survey shows that assumption fails for one of the most cited measures. That has direct consequences for interpreting outcome studies. Whether an agreed definition would improve results, or whether flexibility is genuinely preferable, is unresolved.
Terms
- Nasolabial angle: the angle between the base of the nose and the upper lip, a measure of tip rotation.
- Columella: the strip of skin between the two nostrils.
- Philtrum: the vertical groove in the middle of the upper lip.
- Frankfort plane: a standard horizontal reference line across the head, used in facial measurement.
- Convenience sample: participants recruited because they were readily available, not selected at random.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
Abstract
Background: The nasolabial angle (NLA) is an important aesthetic metric for nasal assessment and correction. Although the literature offers many definitions, none has garnered universal acceptance.
Methods: To gauge the consensus level among practitioners, surveys were administered to a convenience sample of rhinoplasty surgeons soliciting practice characteristics, self-assessment of rhinoplasty experience and expertise, and preferred NLA definition. Choices of NLA definition included the angle between: (A) columella and line intersecting subnasale and labrale superius; (B) columella and line tangent to philtrum; (C) nostril long axis and Frankfort perpendicular; and (D) nostril long axis and vertical facial plane.
Results: Of the 82 total respondents, mean age was 50 years (range, 30-80years), and mean professional experience was 17 years (range, 0-67 years). Nineteen described themselves as novice rhinoplasty surgeons, 27 as intermediates, and 36 as experts. Mean number of lifetime rhinoplasties performed was 966 (range, 0-10,000). Twenty respondents (24%) agreed with definition A, 27 (33%) with B, 16 (20%) with C, and 13 (16%) with D. Six chose "other," offering their own explanations of NLA. Self-identified novices were more likely to prefer definition D than were experts (P = 0.009).
Conclusions: No majority consensus was reached regarding the definition of NLA. Each method has its benefits and drawbacks, and establishing a single one may be unnecessary and even counterproductive in some cases. Having options available means that surgeons can tailor to each encounter, as long as they adopt a systematic methodology. We submit an algorithm to facilitate this effort.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- ASJ Anatomical Study of the Lateral Crural Strut Graft in Rhinoplasty and Its Clinical ApplicationSilva Filho Rde O, Pochat VD2016PMID 27277274Summary
- ASJ 2016PMID 27535924
- ASJ Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media AnalysisKhansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD2016PMID 26063834Summary
- ASJ Perioperative Corticosteroids Reduce Short-Term Edema and Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-AnalysisCoroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Cook DJ et al.2016PMID 26773090Summary
- APS Safe Planes for Injection Rhinoplasty: A Histological Analysis of Midline Longitudinal Sections of the Asian NoseTansatit T, Moon HJ, Rungsawang C et al.2016PMID 26893278Summary
- CPS Rhinoplasty in the African American Patient: Anatomic Considerations and Technical PearlsPeng GL, Nassif PS2016PMID 26616712Summary
- FPS Aesthetic Rhinoplasty as a Surface-Contour Operation: From Analysis to Surgery-Personal ConceptsPietro P, Iman K, Irina V2016PMID 28033632Summary
- FPS Columellar Aesthetics in Open RhinoplastyKridel RW, Kwak ES, Watson JB2016PMID 27494576Summary