rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2016

PRS-GO Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2016

Reshaping of the Anterior Nasal Spine: An Important Step in Rhinoplasty

Marianetti TM, Boccieri A, Pascali M.

What this paper says

Across 160 patients who had the small bony spine at the base of the nose reshaped, no postoperative complications occurred, all reported improved airflow, and 142 rated the aesthetic result excellent.

Overview

The anterior nasal spine is the small bony projection at the base of the nose where the septum anchors. The authors argue it is often overlooked in planning and that its size or position can be abnormal. This study reviews their surgical treatment of that structure, done alone or with other reshaping techniques.

Sections of note

  • 160 patients underwent surgical treatment of the anterior nasal spine, with or without other nasal reshaping.
  • Spine abnormality types: 87 with hyperplasia, 43 with hypoplasia, 30 with deviation.
  • 15 cases had a combination of deviation and hyperplasia.
  • No patients developed postoperative complications.
  • 5 patients who had spine reduction reported numbness in the premaxillary area; sensitivity fully returned within 4 months in all of them.
  • All patients reported postoperative improvement of nasal airflow.
  • Aesthetic result was rated excellent by 142 patients and good by 18.
  • The abstract states no follow-up length beyond the 4-month numbness figure, and no comparison group.

What it means for a patient

  • A small bone at the base of the nose influences the angle between the nose and the lip and can be too large, too small, or off center.
  • Adjusting it is described as simple, and in this series produced no complications.
  • Temporary numbness above the front teeth occurred in 5 of 160 after reduction and resolved within 4 months.
  • Limits: no comparison group, self-reported airflow rather than measured, no stated overall follow-up length, and the satisfaction ratings come from within the treating practice.

Why this paper matters

Nasal analysis usually concentrates on the hump, the tip, and the septum, and this paper argues a small bony landmark deserves routine attention. The reported results are uniformly positive. Without objective airflow measurement or a control group, how much of the benefit came from spine work rather than the other techniques used alongside it is unclear.

Terms

  • Anterior nasal spine: The small bony projection at the base of the nose where the septum anchors.
  • Hyperplasia: Overgrowth, meaning the structure is larger than normal.
  • Hypoplasia: Underdevelopment, meaning the structure is smaller than normal.
  • Nasal pyramid: The overall bone and cartilage framework of the nose.
  • Premaxilla: The front part of the upper jaw, just behind the upper lip.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Unlabelled: The importance of analysis of the nasal spine should not be underestimated in the correct planning of rhinoplasty. Deformations in position with respect to the midline and/or in size are often present, and their correction to ensure harmony between the spine and the other components of the nasal pyramid constitutes a key step in rhinoplasty that can lead to excellent results.

Methods: The study includes 160 patients who underwent surgical treatment of the anterior nasal spine with or without other techniques of nasal reshaping. Eighty-seven of these patients presented with hyperplasia of the nasal spine, 43 with hypoplasia, and 30 with deviation. A combination of deviation and hyperplasia was present in 15 cases.

Results: No patients developed postoperative complications. Five patients who underwent anterior nasal spine reduction reported postoperative numbness in the premaxillary area, but sensitivity was fully regained within 4 months after surgery in these patients. All the patients reported postoperative improvement of nasal airflow. A total of 142 patients considered their postoperative aesthetic result as excellent and 18 as good.

Conclusion: The simplicity of the surgical procedures performed on the nasal spine and the marked aesthetic improvements thus achieved suggest that greater attention should be paid to this anatomical region.

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Year
2016
Authors
3
Type
Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2016.

  1. PRS-GO
    2016PMID 27536499Summary
  2. PRS-GO
    2016PMID 27014540Summary
  3. PRS-GO
    2016PMID 27482503Summary
  4. PRS-GO
    2016PMID 27536492Summary
  5. PRS-GO
    Evaluation of Nasal Tip Definition in Closed Rhinoplasty
    Buckley CE, McArdle A, McInerney NM et al.
    2016PMID 27104102Full text
  6. PRS-GO
    2016PMID 27482502Summary
  7. PRS-GO
    2016PMID 27826459Summary
  8. PRS-GO
    2016PMID 27200245Summary